Deep changes are occurring in natural gas markets – China is entering the global gas scene, driven by continuous economic growth and strong policy support to curb air pollution; the United States is emerging as a global LNG player (see our article on the shale gas revolution at /the-united-states-shale-revolution/), and the industrial sector is set to take over from power as the key driver for natural gas demand. In terms of growth, the African gas sector is no different and is looking to continue to boom in the 2020s, as the region grows economically and investment increases.
Governments in West African countries are increasing their efforts to secure a stable gas supply to enhance power generation capacity and rely less on revenue generated by crude oil. Power is a key determinant and precursor to economic growth, particularly in 3rd world countries. Other African governments are looking to set up their delivery of gas infrastructure, including pipelines, floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) platforms and major gas field projects.
African gas discoveries are stimulating sector growth and infrastructure development in the following countries; Mozambique, Kenya and Tanzania on the east coast, while the emergence of shale gas and the strategic environmental assessment commissioned by the South African government leads the way for exploration on the continent.
A grand vision of an interconnected gas market has been painted by the South African Development Community (SADC) leadership. To better understand this vision, high-level market research on the gas market in the SADC region has been undertaken, and we assess the current position of SADC and suggest a roadmap to achieve it.
1.2 Approach: The SADC Natural Gas Market
The approach we take in this article to assess the market for natural gas via a desktop assessment of demand vs the ability of the SADC region to supply the natural gas. Available research outputs and other forms of data have been collated from the internet, using news websites, company websites, free research papers, and other online data sources, which are used to build into at least some kind of road map for natural gas demand, and equally for the supply of gas.
We begin with a brief snapshot of the SADC (South African Development Community) region, as well as a few relevant facts, properties and characteristics about natural gas.
Many reports, articles and other forms of media releases state large domestic demands in the SADC region. However, little data is provided on precisely the source of the demand in terms of heating, electricity, and other forms. There is, therefore, little data to back up these numbers.
For the demand side assessment, we assess each the uses of natural gas in the third world setting against an expected price of natural gas for that particular use. For example, we compare an expected end to end cost/production price of natural gas needed for cooking purposes with the (existing) price of a substitute product (e.g. firewood). If the price of natural gas is lower than the price for the firewood, then we assume natural gas can act as a substitute for that product. The outcome is that there is then a sufficient price level to warrant a purchaser switching from firewood to natural gas for heating purposes. The demand for natural gas is assumed then to be fulfilled by the lower price disparity, and the demand is then (potentially) realized. Of course, for this assessment, we need a price of natural gas, so we have included a brief section on the current state of natural gas prices in the world, and what an expected selling price could be in the SADC region.
For the supply portion, a high-level assessment is made through the size and location of gas reserves, and the existing infrastructure capable of delivering it to the largest populations. We have used a trigger of cities with a population of more than 1million people by 2025. For the infrastructure, we look at transportation through transport corridors, ports and gas pipe networks. To understand how developed the current state of supply of natural gas is to the SADC market, we also take a brief look at the exiting projects in the region, mainly in South Africa, Mozambique, Tanzania and Angola, and their scope and size.
To conclude, we question whether the current situation in the SADC region is a precursor to the start of the SADC Integrated Natural Gas Market
2. SADC And The Need For An Integrated Natural Gas Market
2.1. The South African Development Community
In 1992, Heads of Government of the region agreed to transform SADCC, (Southern African Development Co-ordination Conference) into the Southern African Development Community (SADC), driven by the focus on the integration of economic development in the region
Figure 1: The South African Development Community (SADC)
As it currently stands, the Southern African Development Community (SADC) is a Regional Economic Community comprising 16 Member States (Figure 1); Angola, Botswana, Comoros, Democratic Republic of Congo, Lesotho, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Seychelles, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. SADC is committed to Regional Integration and poverty eradication within Southern Africa and has many strategic and regional plans to connect the region, to reduce poverty and increase the well-being of the region’s inhabitants. SADC was formed with four principal objectives, namely:
Reduction of Member State dependence, particularly, but not only, on apartheid South Africa;
Forging of linkages to create genuine and equitable regional integration;
Mobilization of Member States’ resources to promote the implementation of national, interstate and regional policies; and
Concerted action to secure international cooperation within the framework of the strategy for economic liberation.
2.2. Regional Gas Infrastructure And Market Development
Through a Regional Gas Infrastructure and Market Development initiative, SADC is currently looking at programs and projects aimed to facilitate the availability of sufficient, reliable, least-cost energy services in support of the ambitions of its principal objectives. The objectives are concurrent with the SADC Protocol on Energy of 1996, which promotes harmonious development of national energy policies and matters of common interest for the balanced and equitable development of energy, throughout the Region.
In 2018, South Africa Minister of Energy Jeff Radebe, in the SADC Ministerial Workshop on Regional Gas Infrastructure and Market Development, outlined a vision for the SADC community. In this he identified key constraints to the realization of this vision:
Do we have the policy and regulatory framework to provide an enabling environment to exploit our natural resources in the region?
Do we have the gas infrastructure to transport the gas within the region to markets?
Does the region have sufficient demand to pay for infrastructure development?
Will there be funding available for the mega-regional project?
These are critical questions. Numerous authors in other developing countries have identified these as recurring issues that hinder the development of not only gas resources but most infrastructure projects. The same problems, therefore, seem to keep arising in most 3rd world countries.
3. A Brief Background of Natural Gas
3.1. Gas Facts
As a brief introduction and for ease of the reader, a summary of some relevant aspects of gas is provided here.
Natural gas is a naturally occurring hydrocarbon gas mixture consisting primarily of methane
Commonly includes varying amounts of other higher alkanes, and sometimes a small percentage of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, hydrogen sulfide, or helium
Generates temperatures above 1,100 °C (2,000 °F) making it a powerful domestic cooking and heating fuel.
Used as a source electricity generation.
It is also used as a fuel for vehicles and as a chemical feedstock in the manufacture of plastics and other commercially important organic chemicals.
Because of its low density, it is not easy to store natural gas or to transport it by vehicle.
Gas needs to be liquefied to transport because its low density means it takes up high volume and transport in its gaseous state becomes unfeasible.
Gas is transported in liquified overland by either pipeline or road/rail-based transport.
Natural gas pipelines are impractical across oceans since the gas needs to be cooled down and compressed.
Long term contracts have traditionally always been signed between developers of gas fields and off-takers, to provide sufficient security against the risk of poor future cash flows. This, however, seems to be changing.
The readers’ attention should be please be guided to the significantly more extensive articles in the EPCM catalogue if more detail is needed:
In our assessment, the price of natural gas is a key determinant of the likelihood of people to switch from one product to natural gas, and in our assumption, in a 3rd world country is the only reason why someone would switch, i.e. environmental impact and other aspects do not play a role in decision making.
In the medium to long term, the IEA forecasts US gas prices will increase in the short term to around $7/MMBtu, by 2040. This is because the more profitable reserves are being used first, with the less profitable projects remaining. Inevitably, producers then tend to develop higher-cost projects to meet demand, while still maintaining some level of profitability.
Figure 2: LNG prices
The biggest uncertainty surrounding gas demand and price projections is related to
the costs of alternative energy solutions and
countries’ policies in diversifying their energy sources and implementing the Paris Agreement.
In the longer term, it is also thought that the international gas market will become more flexible, which will narrow the price difference between the European and the Asian markets. The IEA projects that European and Asian market prices will settle above the US price by around $4–5/MMBtu and $5–6/MMBtu, respectively. These spreads result from the US continuing to be the lowest-cost exporting producer in the long run, with Asian prices slightly above European prices owing to the transport cost differential.
4. A Brief History of SADC Natural Gas Markets
The information available on the historical development of the SADC gas market is focused on four SADC countries; Angola, Tanzania, Mozambique and South Africa. The other remaining SADC countries either started only recently in gas exploration or have gas markets in their absolute infancy. Madagascar is currently considering exploration natural gas reserves, and Namibia has already discovered two smaller fields offshore.
4.2. Market Size Growth
Gas is currently a minor part of the Angolan hydrocarbons industry, although the only country in the SADC region with an LNG regasification plant. Natural gas is overshadowed by oil. BMI estimates marketable gas production for 2016 as at 3.5bcm, yet actual production will have been significantly higher, with the excess gas reinjected into oil fields or flared. Angola stands out from the rest of Southern Africa as being the dominant, and indeed only oil producer. However, their gas exploration activities have only started recently. The country’s oil industry started commercial-scale production from the off-shore Cabinda fields in the 1960s. Angola has since developed a significant petro-economy with the attendant features of high reliance on oil sector revenues.
Mozambique has been producing gas since the onshore Pande and Temane fields were brought into production through the Sasol Rompco pipeline to South Africa in 2004. The discovery of major gas reserves in the offshore Rovuma Basin in the north of Mozambique has led to the recalibration of Mozambique as a major natural gas resources country and ranked first in the SADC region.
Further north in Tanzania gas exploration has been underway since 1952. The first discovery of natural gas was made in 1974 in Songo Songo area, Kilwa district in Lindi Region. Eight years later in 1982, the second discovery took place in Mnazi Bay area in Mtwara region. The discovery of the natural gas reserves in these areas promoted gas research on the coastal and offshore areas, which were arguably the forerunner to the bigger more recent discoveries. Studies were carried out by international oil companies. There have been other discoveries south of Dar es Salaam, in the areas of Mkuranga, North Kiliwani and Ntorya, between 2007 and 2012, but the extraction from these discoveries awaits infrastructure. In 1991, a natural gas purification plant was built on the island of Songo Songo along with the pipeline for exporting natural gas to Dar es Salaam. To the south of Dar es Salaam, an estimated 2.1 million cubic feet are used to generate electricity that serves the Mtwara and Lindi regions, on the southern border.
The markets of the SADC region have been rather small when compared to the rest of Africa. Over the last 40 to 50 years the gas market has been concentrated in the exploration sector in Tanzania, Mozambique and South Africa. Recently Namibia and Angola have entered the exploration markets. Madagascar’s oil exploration industry is rather small, but the country has been considering gas exploration. The other SADC countries such as Zambia, Zimbabwe, Seychelles and Reunion have not been involved significantly, if at all, in the exploration sector.
Of the countries in the SADC region, South Africa has been using the most gas over the longest period. The gas pipeline network in Johannesburg, fed from the ROMPCO pipelines, supply areas of Johannesburg, South Africa largest population centre, with gas. Angola has been using gas for its 750MW Soyo gas power plant, which started producing power for the capital city’s electricity grid in 2017, using LNG from a variety of national oil blocks as well as the Angola LNG plant, its only liquefaction facility. The Soyo combined cycle power plant will be integrated into the wider Angola power network in the second phase. Tanzania small reserves south of Dar es Salaam have been producing gas for the local markets, consisting of gas for heating, cooking mainly for lower-income and poor households, as well as the production of electricity for the region just south of Dar Es Salaam.
5. Current SADC Natural Gas Market
Here we assess the market from both a demand-side (user needs and population size) and a supply-side (available reserves, population size and location, existing infrastructure, current projects)
5.1. Demand In The SADC Gas Market
As mentioned earlier, there are several reasons for the strong worldwide demand for natural gas, largely driven by the following:
China is entering the global gas scene, driven by continuous economic growth and strong policy support to curb air pollution;
The United States is emerging as a global LNG player; and
The industry sector is set to take over from power as the key driver for natural gas demand.
However, in the context of the development of the SADC region, these are secondary. Third-world developing countries have different needs, driven by large and poor populations. Their need is determined by day to day living, i.e. heating, cooking, transport, food production. This in turn drives the necessity for electricity, fuel for home fires, feedstock for livestock and fish stock, as well as fertilizers for agricultural produce.
Typically, the average African homestead does not have access to gas or other fuel for heating and cooking; firewood is the fuel. This is expensive in terms of time to collect. Transport is by foot or bicycle. Little livestock is kept other than several chickens, goats or cows that have little to feed on. Agriculture is severely limited by rainfall, heat and soil conditions. Gas can change this, and therefore in third world countries has a demand-driven by the following interlinked factors:
Uses of natural gas.
According to IEA, consumption in Africa is expected to rise at a rate of 3.1% per year. Angola is currently developing 400MW of gas-fired power plants, Tanzania is aggressively pursuing a domestic gas to power agenda that could result in 500 bcm being committed to the domestic market
5.1.1. Uses of Natural Gas
The majority of the population in sub-Saharan Africa depends on solid biomass for cooking and heating. The proportion is exceeding 90% for the rural population. There are a variety of different issues linked to the use of solid biomass such as the large health burden resulting from ingesting particulates and pollutants from the combustion of the solid biomass. Figure 3 shows the fuels used for cooking in Eastern Africa. In rural areas, up to 93% of the population depends on the wood. In urban areas, the fuels most used for cooking are slightly different and vary between wood, charcoal and kerosene.
Figure 3: Fuel types in
To supply natural gas to residential users, a gas distribution network that connects the households to the city gate station has to be deployed. Transport of modular gas containers can be done via road and rail transport, but this quickly becomes expensive and is probably better suited to supply rural areas where there sparse and small populations exist. Pipeline infrastructure is economically viable in urban centres due to the dense populations. The penetration of natural gas as cooking fuel in urban and rural areas depends on its price compared to the available alternatives.
Table 1 shows a comparison of the cost of the two main clean alternatives and the three most used cooking fuels in Eastern Africa’s urban areas. The different alternatives have specific efficiencies that have been taken into account to calculate a price for the same reference heat output, which is the heat output provided by one MMBtu of natural gas used in a standard cooking appliance. The cheapest fuels are charcoal ($ 18/MMBtu) and wood ($ 25/MMBtu), which explains why there are still largely used in urban areas.
Kerosene ($41 – $62/MMBtu) is between 2 and 3 times higher than charcoal and wood depending on the country. Concerning the clean alternatives, LPG is close to the price of kerosene and electricity is on average cheaper. To allow for a large penetration of natural gas for cooking, its retail price has to be competitive with the cheapest alternatives, which are wood and charcoal, as well as electricity if its price for residential users is around $0.1/kWh or lower. Using Table 1, we can assume that a competitive retail price for natural gas would therefore be in the range of $15 – 25/MMBtu.
Table 1: Comparison of cooking fuels in East Africa urban areas
With high economic and population growths, electricity consumption in sub-Saharan countries is expected to increase drastically. There are several ways to achieve this high electricity demand.
Solar generation has a great potential in Africa with an average daily solar irradiation of 5 – 6 kWh/m2 but is largely undeveloped due to high cost.
Hydropower is another important means of providing electricity, with the advantage of low electricity production costs (around $0.03 -0.05/kWh). However, hydro resources are not equally distributed across the SADC region and long-distance transmission lines are required to fully exploit the sites with the largest potential.
Diesel driven engines are other alternatives but have high operational and maintenance costs and emissions.
When natural gas is available, gas-fired combined cycle power plants represent an interesting solution. The gas-fired combined cycle power plant is the most efficient (in terms of energy and emissions) technology to convert fossil fuel into electricity.
In sub-Saharan Africa, the production cost of electricity is highly variable (Figure 4). Outside of the borders of coal-powered (and some nuclear powered) South Africa, the power generation is essentially based on hydroelectricity and diesel generators; either unreliable or costly and dirty.
Figure 4: Cost of electricity in Sub Saharan Africa
In 2015, only the most competitive renewable power plant solutions could compete with coal – and gas-powered power plants. This is partly because of the low operating costs resulting from depressed prices of the coal and gas feedstock. In the coming years, it is expected that the impressive cost reductions observed in some renewable technologies (particularly wind and solar) will continue to drive down costs, making them increasingly competitive with fossil-fuel-based power plants (Figure 5), which are expected to become more expensive as a result of higher feedstock price projections increasing operating expenditures. Whether renewable energies take off in the SADC region is yet to be seen. Technologies that have already matured and where there are no expected price changes in the feedstock, such as hydropower, are not expected to see significant cost changes.
Figure 5: Energy Costs for 2015 and 2040
Several different studies indicate that for gas-to-power, a gas price below a value of between $12 /MMBtu and $48/MMBtu would allow producing electricity with a Combined Cycle Power Plant at a lower cost than from diesel.
Compressed Natural gas (CNG) can be used as fuel for road vehicles. Natural gas vehicle growth is particularly important in the Asia-Pacific region, where natural gas represents a cheaper alternative to conventional fuels (gasoline and diesel). An important advantage of natural gas over diesel and gasoline is a lower level of emissions (particles, CO2, NOx and SO2). The drawback of CNG is that the range is about 3.5 times shorter when compared to gasoline or diesel for the same tank volume. The CNG vehicle requires a cylindrical tank pressurized at about ~3500 psi (240 bar). There is currently limited demand for gas vehicles in the SADC region, but there is an opportunity for gas-powered vehicles to realize a large proportion of the regions transport needs, and thus facilitate the expansion of the ‘gas-powered economy’ in the region.
In most sub-Saharan countries, oil products are imported, and the retail prices of diesel and gasoline are high. Hence, domestic natural gas could offer a competitive alternative. Although LPG is only marginally used for transportation, it could be seen as an alternative to conventional fuels. Retail prices have been converted in $/MMBtu to allow the comparison with natural gas. In the US, the CNG price at refuelling station is on average 25% higher than the price at the city gate. Assuming a similar ratio for Eastern African countries, the natural gas price at city gate should not exceed $25/MMBtu to $52/MMBtu, depending on the country (see Figure 8), to represent a competitive alternative to conventional transportation fuels.
Usage of motor vehicles in SADC countries is relatively low compared to other third world countries like China and of course 1st world countries. A significant step up in terms of availability of vehicles and the fuel is needed before a decent market is established in this.
Sub- Saharan Africa’s agricultural productivity is low compares to other developing countries. The same is true in the SADC region. In Sub- Saharan Africa in 2010, the average fertilizer use was 8 kg/ha, compared to 303 kg/ha in East Asia and 107 g/ha in North America. This low use of fertilizers is essentially due to the relatively high retail prices for the farmers. The supply of fertilizers relies on imports and the transportation costs (including ocean freight, port costs and truck transport) significantly impact the retail prices.
The main nutrients provided by fertilizers are nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K). The most often, nitrogenous fertilizers are produced using natural gas. The natural gas cost represents on average around 50% of the price of ammonia which is the main feedstock for producing nitrogenous fertilizer such as urea.
If affordable natural gas is available in sub-Saharan Africa, domestic production of nitrogenous fertilizer could be developed. For the domestic production of this fertilizer, the distribution costs can be estimated at around $115/ton. It appears that a domestic production with a natural gas price as high as $15/MMBtu could supply urea at a very competitive cost ($570/ton) compared to importing urea.
Figure 6 shows a large variation in the yearly average price for urea between 2010 and 2012. In 2010 – the most favourable year – the average price of urea was between $549/ton and $808/ton depending on the country.
Figure 6: Nitrogenous Fertilizer retail price in Eastern Africa
Considering these values for domestic production and distribution, the price of natural gas should be in the range of $14 – 24/MMBtu or lower to produce locally fertilizer that would be competitive with imports.
Animal and fish feed
Natural gas can be used to produce animal and fish feed. The pellets are made using methane-eating bacteria — methanotrophs — that are found naturally in soil and lakes. These are fed methane gas, which makes them grow and multiply into protein-rich biomass that can be dried and turned into animal feed.
The process is essentially fermentation of sugar into acids, gases or alcohol, mainly by yeast and bacteria. With most fermentation, the carbon source is sugar, whereas here the carbon source is from the methane in the natural gas. The produce could be able to supply the growing demand for feed in the aquaculture and agriculture markets – such as farmed fish, crustaceans and livestock – in more environmentally sustainable ways.
The process uses somewhere between 60 and 80% less water than alternative ingredients including soy and wheat proteins. In the SADC market, the animal and fish feed can be used to supplement either traditional or commercial animal farming activities, thereby substituting more expensive types of feed with a gas produced. Unfortunately, due to the infancy of the development of the research into the commercialization of the process, there is little information available on production costs, but the research suggests that when gas prices are above 20-30% of the current price the technology is not commercially feasible and will not provide a product that can be substituted for other forms of feed used in the SADC region.
5.1.2. Populations in The SADC Region
Market size is a key determinant of the demand for natural gas. All else being equal, more people equates to higher demand. In the SADC region, there are several population centres of over 1m people (Figure 7). By 2025, these spread to several inland locations; Harare, Lusaka, Mbuji-Mayi and Lubumbashi and an ever-growing Gauteng area in South Africa.
Figure 7: SADC major population centres – 2025 estimates
The largest population centres (14-16m) are concentrated in Dar es Salaam, Johannesburg and Kinshasha, with Dar es Salaam being the only that is a coastal city with port access for shipping. Luanda, Cape Town, Ethekweni (Durban), Antananarivo and Maputo are all significant centres (5-8m), with Antananarivo being the only non-coastal city of significant population.
Short sea shipping is an option for the coastal centres, while for smaller towns a mixture of piping and road/rail transport is necessary. For a location like Kinshasa, river barging may be appropriate but is likely to be cheaper via pipeline.
5.2. SADC Ability To Supply Natural Gas to the Market
5.2.1. GAS Reserves
According to EIA, at the end of 2019, the world had proven natural gas reserves of some 200,000 bcm, and Africa 15,700 bcm, around 8% of the world’s total. Exploration on the continent has yielded an increase of around 1% in total African gas reserves since 2018.
Even though 90% of gas production continues to come from Algeria, Nigeria, Egypt and Libya, the SADC countries are currently planning to utilize their gas reserves in as effective a way possible to grow their economies and improve the livelihoods of their people.
The region sits on reserves currently estimated at approximately 1,500 bcm, around 0.7% of the world’s total, the majority in Mozambique and Tanzania. South Africa, Angola, Zimbabwe and Namibia all have discovered gas, some more so than others.
Details of the region’s most promising reserves are provided in Table 2. They are split per country, reserve status (1P = proven reserves at 90% likelihood), and 3P reserves which are considered as estimates and probable), as well as project phase.
Table 2: SADC Gas Reserves
Most of the reserves are currently still being investigated further. What stands out is the size of the Rovuma gas fields as well as the offshore gas field in south Tanzania, the three in total amounting to 7,000 bcm. South Africa Karoo shale gas as a P3 reserves features prominently, but with several varying estimates, the exact amount is quite uncertain. For more information on South Africa Brulpadda reserves, see our article at /brulpadda-totals-offshore-discovery/.
Concerning Angola, Mozambique and Tanzania, the volume of gas resources is not a constraint to wider utilization of natural gas as it is with the smaller gas fields. Each of these countries is attempting to transition to a significant gas producer and consumer from a low base that most notably in the case of Mozambique requires bringing on-stream gas reserves that are orders of magnitude larger than the already producing fields.
Several common themes are present:
There are significant gas reserves in the SADC region;
There are large distances between reserves and major market centres;
Gas production and transportation by pipeline or gasification are capital intensive investments for which scale economies are critical; and
Many other countries and regions are also expanding their gas production capacity which feeds into softer world markets and greater difficulties in securing off-take contracts necessary to commit investment decisions.
A coordinated approach is, therefore, necessary to avoid competition diluting the benefits of low transport costs. However, in a world of competition and free markets, this may be difficult.
With the sheer size of the Tanzanian and Mozambican gas fields, SADC countries close to the reserve have a double advantage, economies of scale and lower transport costs. Within SADC, South Africa, Zambia, and Malawi, through proximity, all can access this gas at relatively cheaper prices. South Africa, already has a gas pipeline from Mozambique that runs over a distance of about half that from the Tanzanian and Mozambican fields.
Figure 8: Gas Reserves: Approximate location and size (Green = Operational, Yellow = P1 reserves, Red = Probable Estimates P3 Reserves. Brown sphere = total African reserves at 15,000 bcm)
5.2.2. Legal And Regulatory Aspects
Gas is different from oil. The lower energy content per unit, dependency on local infrastructure, asset specificity, capital expenditure and the need to secure a market at the early stages of a project makes the exploration and production projects for natural gas different from those of oil. As such, a typical contract would treat natural gas somewhat differently from oil and, from the producer perspective, the contract between the producer and the gas purchaser becomes crucial for the project.
Long-term supply contracts are an essential part of the financing of large-scale natural resource projects by providing security as to off-take and prices, from exploration and production to pipelines and/or natural gas liquefaction facilities.
Long-term natural gas commodity contracts have for decades been the backbone of the EU security of supply. From the 1970s, these contracts have been used to import more than 250 Bcm/year of natural gas to the EU area. Accepted as the modus operandi among both producers and the EU purchasers, the traditional view is that long-term take-or-pay contracts provide for the security of demand for the producer and security of steady supply for the purchaser. The producer has the certainty of demand and can plan for the necessary investments with a long-term rationale. The purchaser has the certainty of supplies and can therefore adopt a long-term strategy in downstream markets.
In the SADC context, the long term contract needs project developers to trust that governments will uphold their end of the contract. Perhaps traditionally, Africa has a legacy of poor contractual performance, an unsophisticated, if any, regulatory environment, and a poor justice system. These are precursors to lack of trust in contracts. Regulations are essential and indeed, this seems to be changing, perhaps off the back the success of other African hydrocarbons industries, such as Libya’s, Nigeria’s and Angola’s. In Mozambique and Tanzania for example, long term contracts are largely in place for a large proportion of the reserves in the ground, a highly promising position. To top it off, South Africa has of course been importing gas from Mozambique since 2003, a 16-year history of trust.
5.2.3. Transport Corridors
The SADC region has an extensive network of freight transport corridor. These freight transport corridors were first established in the 1980s because of the many landlocked countries in the region, but a particular motivation was to bypass South Africa in rejection of the apartheid government in South Africa at the time. The corridors were mostly identified starting from a port and developed protruding inwards towards the landlocked countries (Figure 9).
Figure 9: Transport Corridors and ports in the SADC region
Today, the SADC transport corridors are regarded as some of the most successful corridors in the world. Some features that made them successful include common political objectives, adopting a common language (English), similar road and rail design and operational standards, cooperation among member states, and the establishment of corridor-specific secretariats. The SADC corridor approach to regional development is based on well-maintained and operated infrastructure and the provision of seamless transport services.
However, although the corridors have been successful to date, there are several challenges relating to providing adequate regional infrastructure and related transport services, a setting that urgently requires strategies to improve and expand the freight transport system to meet emerging demand. Freight transport in the SADC region is furthermore characterized by extreme polarization in favour of road transport. The setup translates into a situation in which there are numerous negative aspects, including a high rate of transport-related accidents, road congestion, high infrastructure expenditure, and environmental damage. This inevitably results in high transport costs.
South African ports dominate the extensive port system in the SADC region, both in terms of sheer numbers and capacity and volumes handled. South African ports also serve the majority of landlocked countries in the SADC region (Figure 9). Most ports in the SADC region were primarily designed to serve the needs of the individual countries and their natural hinterlands, and thus there is an apparent fragmentation in the general transport networks that connects the ports. Many of the SADC ports are also general ports focused on a variety of imports and mineral exports and hence are not adapted to SSS.
Additionally, the high average growth rate in Africa over the last few years has had a marked effect on the utilisation and efficiency of these ports, and many are operating around their design capacity. Opportunities for new operations are emerging slowly, such as the specialization of ports for container handling or dry bulk handling, especially in high-potential markets such as Namibia and Tanzania.
Short sea shipping has the theoretical potential to work in the SADC given the large geographic region, projected freight volumes, and customs and trade policies the SADC region is pursuing. Such a system would have three main roles: to offer unimodal freight transport between port cities, to offer the main leg of an intermodal route, and to offer feeder services to deep-sea shipping in a hub-and-spoke cycle. However, freight transport in the SADC region has several shortfalls that need to be addressed—of note, port competitiveness, customs provisions, and policies for intra-regional trade require impetus. However, the uploading and discharge of the gas from the vessel through liquefaction and regasification via FSRU offshore can be challenging, especially in environmentally sensitive and harsh offshore metocean conditions.
5.2.5. Gas Pipe Network
The SADC pipe network is at an early stage of development. Sasol pipes gas from the Pande Temane reserve in Mozambique to Sasolburg. From there it is distributed to the greater Johannesburg area.
There are several other projects currently being studied to increase the available pipe network in the SADC region, and these are mostly focused on the Eastern SADC countries. These studies are still in their infancy, but SASOL has indeed shown that long distant gas pipelines can work in Africa.
Figure 10: SADC Gas Pipe Network
5.2.6. Status of Major SADC New Gas Infrastructure Projects
Mozambique’s current natural gas production is operated by Sasol (South Africa) in Inhambane Province, which holds proven reserves of 300bcm. The natural gas is produced and processed at a central facility in Temane and then transported via an 865 km pipeline to South Africa, with a link to southern Mozambique for domestic use. Additionally, Sasol will develop an integrated oil and liquefied petroleum gas project adjacent to its existing petroleum facility. The project includes 13 wells and an LPG production facility at an estimated cost of USD1.4 billion.
Due to the discovery of over 4500bcm of natural gas reserves in the Rovuma basin by Texas-based Anadarko (Area 1) and Italian firm ENI (Area 4), Mozambique is expected to become a major exporter by 2023. Anadarko will build an LNG plant to process the gas they discovered in Area 1, off the northern coast of Mozambique near the border with Tanzania. It selected a joint venture of developers that includes McDermott (USA), Saipem (Italy) and Chiyoda (Japan) to construct the Afungi LNG Park valued at USD 25-30 billion. Anadarko expects to conclude several sales and purchase agreements (SPA) by year-end for liquefied natural gas (LNG) and they announced their final investment decision in June 2019 for USD 25 billion during the recent US-Africa Doing Business Summit Conference. This is a major investment for Mozambique and the first of such value in the entire African continent.
On June 1, 2017, ENI announced the final investment decision amounting to USD 8 billion for the construction of six subsea wells connected to a Floating Liquified Natural Gas (FLNG) production facility in Area 4, which is due for completion in mid-2022. The Engineering Procurement and Construction (EPC) contract was officially awarded to a consortium composed of TechnipFMC, JGC, and Samsung Heavy Industries. Furthermore, in 2018, ExxonMobil acquired from ENI a 25% indirect interest in the Area 4 block. As part of this agreement, ENI will lead all upstream operations, and ExxonMobil will lead the construction and operation of liquefaction facilities onshore to be located in the Afungi LNG Park.
The international gas outlook indicates that the overseas natural gas markets are large and lucrative enough in the medium to long term to make the development of Tanzanian offshore gas deposits economically viable. It is therefore understandable why proposals from international oil companies (IOCs) in Tanzania have focused on liquefaction of the gas for export.
As recognized by the Government of Tanzania, however, natural gas can be a powerful tool to facilitate the country’s broader economic development and diversification, as it provides a readily available and relatively clean source of energy for power generation, industrial use and residential consumption as compared with coal, liquid fuels and biomass.
Thus, the complex and important questions related to the use of the gas domestically must be answered in all countries that develop their gas primarily for export. The Government of Tanzania, through Article 8 of its production-sharing agreements, has the right to require IOCs to make available up to an extra 10% of the exported gas to be sold within Tanzania.
Before its final approval of the offshore development and LNG proposals, the Government must agree with upstream companies on the arrangements as to how much gas will be reserved for domestic use, how it will be delivered, how costs will be shared and the price for the gas that will be paid to the developers. Each of these upstream arrangements must be considered in conjunction with decisions on how onward usage, transmission and pricing of that gas to final consumers will work. This section outlines some of the key considerations that will need to be taken into account in domestic gas allocation.
Most of the dry natural gas is exported to South Africa via the ROMPCO international gas pipeline. Current pipeline export is some 3.65 bcm. Those fields have an estimated end of life around 2027, and Sasol is therefore actively exploring adjacent blocks.
Development by Sasol and its partners around the Temane fields in the Inhambane province has moved onto engineering design to handle wet and dry gas as well as LPG. Most of the gas will go to a 400 megawatt (MW) power plant in Maputo with the rest destined for third-party customers using the ROMPCO pipeline.
VGN and NGV Gas receive natural gas at a distribution station in Langlaagte via the Sasol Gas pipeline that runs from Temane to Secunda and then to Johannesburg. It then distributes gas to customers anywhere within a 300 km radius of this distribution station, managing the entire delivery process on a pay-as-you-use basis according to customers’ energy requirements.
6. A Roadmap For SADC: The Future
Getting the gas to the markets
The large reserves found in Tanzania and Mozambique, totalling some 3% of the world’s reserves, are no doubt going to assist to take the SADC regions vision of an integrated gas market to fruition. Piping natural gas from Mozambique to South Africa has shown that this can technically work over some 1000km. Connecting this existing pipeline to the gas fields in northern Mozambique and southern Tanzania, and to Dar es salaam, will significantly open up the entire eastern seaboard of Africa, south of Kenya, to the gas market. Relatively short tap in lines can then feed the internal landlocked markets of Harare, Lusaka, Mbuji-Mayi and Lubumbashi, and open up Zimbabwe, Malawi and Zambia to gas markets. The existing road and rail network can assist in getting the gas to the smaller markets, i.e. villages and other types of informal settlements, in a small modular form suitable for cooking and heating.
As for the western seaboard of SADC, Cape Town and Windhoek, as the largest population centres, can be served via short sea shipping from the gas export facilities in Mozambique and Tanzania. The markets of Kinshasha and Luanda can be served from Angola’s 3P reserves, and perhaps even the Mozambique and Tanzania reserves via short sea shipping.
The industry can be reassessed in the large capital cities for manufacturing plants for gas-assisted fertilizer and animal feedstock plants, especially where these cities are close to the larger agriculture and livestock farming economies.
Re-alignment of the long term contract
Due to the increased flexibility that LNG, spot markets and potentially unconventional natural gas providers, the significance of long-term take-or-pay contracts from the purchaser point of view have started to change in the EU. Alternative sources of supply, together with the storage of natural gas where possible, provide for flexibility in the incumbent’s purchasing portfolio that downplays the need to rely on long-term contracts. It requires a well-developed gas market in the SADC region before this approach can be emulated between the major SADC gas producers (arguably Tanzania, Mozambique, Angola and South Africa) and the potential major SADC purchasers (Democratic Republic of Congo, South Africa and Madagascar).
Achieving SADC Developmental Goals
Natural gas is already a reality for industrial and transport sectors within a 300 km radius of Johannesburg thanks to NERSA-approved gas traders Virtual Gas Network (VGN) and NGV Gas’ development of a compressed natural gas distribution infrastructure, including delivery networks, filling stations and conversion systems. These companies have already converted state hospitals, canneries and manufacturing and assembly plants across a range of industries, in addition to commercial fleets, busses and around 1 000 taxis, to natural gas.
In so doing, the end-users have been able to:
Reduce energy/fuel costs Natural gas has a high energy content and excellent price/kilojoule ratio, with consistent energy outputs that improve efficiency. Natural gas delivers 20% to 40% cost savings over petrol and diesel.
Enhance site and vehicle safety Lighter than air, natural gas dissipates quickly into the atmosphere, reducing the risk of fire pools. It’s also more difficult to ignite, with a combustion temperature of 600° C (150° C higher than petrol and LPG).
Lower operational and maintenance costs This cleaner-burning fuel reduces residue, stench and carbon build-up, lowering maintenance requirements and extending service intervals and prolonging overall equipment life, both in plants and in vehicles. This reduces downtime and loss of production time.
Go green Natural gas emits less CO2 and other harmful greenhouse gases than other fossil fuels. The inevitable introduction of carbon credits in South Africa will emphasize the economic and environmental importance of natural gas increasingly.
Enjoy stable pricing schedules Natural gas isn’t prone to the constant price fluctuations seen in crude oil products and therefore allows for greater budgeting accuracy while increasing customer cash flow.
Enhancing access to natural gas Natural gas can be distributed in various ways: through pipelines; compressed in high-pressure cylinders, or liquefied by freezing to -163° C in cryogenic tanks.
The increased availability in Gauteng of this superior, alternative energy source is enhancing long-term profitability of assets in the industrial and transport sectors. As South Africa’s gas economy develops, the country will be able to increase production efficiencies, economic growth and job creation, and reducing reliance on a less-efficient, polluting fuel used in ageing energy infrastructure.
An early start?
South Africa, Angola and Tanzania are relatively far more advanced in terms of using gas for domestic use and electricity generation when compared to the remainder of SADC. This is important because it means there is an example for SADC to learn from, a backbone of exploration activities (most of the SADC countries), moderate levels of extraction from the relatively small fields in Mozambique, Tanzania and Angola, liquefication facilities and supply network feeding the cities (Johannesburg) and the power plants (Angola and Tanzania), which all provide a very positive indication that SADC has (at least, pre-emptively) started to move forward in its grand ambition to connect the member countries with natural gas.
The gas has a huge role to play in the social and economic development of the region, from heating, cooking, transport, fertilizer, feedstock and bunker fuel; the direct and indirect benefits to the population are immense, and perhaps it has already begun.
Demierre, Jonathan & Bazilian, Morgan & Carbajal, Jonathan & Sherpa, Shaky & Modi, Vijay. (2014). Potential for regional use of East Africa’s natural gas. Applied Energy. 143.