Technology deep-dive: Wastewater Technology and its Role in Mining in South Africa

By Dr DF Duvenhage

Introduction

South Africa’s mining sector is one of the country’s most established and pivotal industries, representing a foundational element of its economy. With vast mineral wealth and a well-developed infrastructure, South Africa has become a global leader in producing precious and industrial minerals. This sector, deeply rooted in the country’s history and development, contributes significantly to the national GDP, provides vital employment opportunities, and is a key export driver [1].

Mining in South Africa spans a wide range of commodities, including gold, platinum, coal, iron ore, and manganese. The country holds some of the world’s largest reserves of platinum and gold, making it a primary supplier of these valuable resources globally. The platinum group metals (PGMs) industry alone accounts for a substantial share of exports, drawing international investment and maintaining South Africa’s position in global markets [2].

The mining sector’s economic contribution extends beyond just production. As a major employer, it supports hundreds of thousands of direct jobs and even more indirectly, creating a ripple effect across supporting industries such as manufacturing, engineering, and logistics. Mines require extensive infrastructure, technology, and maintenance, stimulating growth in multiple sectors, from equipment manufacturing to consulting and skilled labor. For local communities, especially in mining-intensive regions, this industry has historically been one of the few reliable sources of income and development.

Exports from South Africa’s mines continue to be essential for the country’s trade balance, bringing in foreign exchange and bolstering economic resilience. The global demand for minerals, especially critical metals for green technologies like batteries and renewable energy, has made South Africa an important player in the worldwide shift toward sustainable energy.

However, the sector faces challenges, including regulatory pressures, environmental concerns, and the need for sustainable water management—vital given South Africa’s limited water resources. Increasingly stringent environmental regulations and the high operation costs require innovative approaches, such as adopting new technologies to improve efficiency and minimize the ecological impact [3].

Overall, South Africa’s mining sector remains the backbone of the economy, essential for job creation, industrial growth, and international trade. Its ongoing development and adaptation are crucial for maintaining South Africa’s competitive edge while aligning with global sustainability goals.

Water challenges in South Africa are among the country’s most pressing issues, affecting its economy, environment, and social well-being. With limited water resources, South Africa is classified as a water-scarce nation, with an average annual rainfall well below the global average. This scarcity is compounded by seasonal variations and erratic rainfall patterns, creating fluctuations in water availability that disrupt communities and industries alike [4].

Several key factors influence South Africa’s water scarcity. First, the uneven rainfall distribution means that the eastern parts of the country receive significantly more rainfall than the arid western regions. Consequently, some regions are naturally predisposed to water shortages, relying heavily on infrastructure like dams and pipelines to transport water from more abundant areas. Climate change exacerbates these regional differences, intensifying droughts and reducing rainfall predictability, which has led to increasingly severe dry periods.

Seasonal variability also plays a role. South Africa experiences periodic droughts, particularly in provinces like the Western Cape, where the 2018 drought pushed Cape Town to the brink of “Day Zero”, when taps would have run dry. Such extreme events highlight the urgent need for sustainable water management and have served as wake-up calls for policymakers and the public. These challenges have fueled efforts to reduce consumption, promote efficient use, and explore alternative water sources [5].

Given these challenges, the demand for sustainable water management solutions is paramount. South Africa is making strides by investing in water-saving technologies, wastewater treatment, and recycling. For example, industries, including mining and agriculture, increasingly use innovative solutions to reuse water and improve efficiency. Municipal water authorities also implement conservation programs to reduce water losses through better infrastructure maintenance and public awareness campaigns.

Sustainable water management will require a multi-faceted approach combining technological innovation, policy reform, and public cooperation. Solutions like desalination plants, improved rainwater harvesting, and strict water-use regulations are being explored to ensure a secure water future. However, addressing these challenges will demand collaboration across all sectors, from industry to government to local communities, as South Africa adapts to its water-scarce reality and works towards long-term water security [6].

Mining is a substantial water-intensive industry, consuming vast amounts of water. Water is indispensable to mining, from ore processing and dust suppression to equipment cooling, as shown in Figure 1, and tailings management. However, this high consumption results in equally high wastewater outputs, often laden with contaminants such as heavy metals, suspended solids, and chemicals. This makes effective wastewater treatment crucial to protect surrounding ecosystems and ensure water resources are used sustainably and responsibly.

Figure 1: Cooling ponds at a mine. [7]

Water usage in mining poses significant environmental risks if not carefully managed. Wastewater discharge from mines can pollute rivers, groundwater, and soil, harming biodiversity and impacting local communities that rely on these water sources. Contaminants like arsenic, mercury, and cyanide, frequently found in mining wastewater, pose severe health risks for both wildlife and humans if released untreated. Moreover, untreated wastewater can increase acidity levels in natural water bodies, further destabilizing the local environment.

However, one commonly overlooked wastewater stream at mining operations is sewerage from the change houses, hostels, and other ablution facilities. While mining companies are increasingly adopting advanced wastewater treatment technologies to mitigate these impacts from process wastewater, sewerage reclamation is rarely considered. Nevertheless, by treating and reusing wastewater, mines can reduce their freshwater requirements, a critical advantage in water-scarce areas, such as South Africa. Although emerging and established technologies such as reverse osmosis, electrochemical treatment, and bio-treatment systems are helping mines achieve higher water purity and facilitate recycling of their process wastewater streams, an opportunity exists to conserve the stressed water resources by implementing sewerage wastewater reclamation.

Compliance with environmental regulations is another key factor driving wastewater treatment in mining. In South Africa, stringent laws under the National Water Act require mining companies to manage their water use and treatment responsibly. Non-compliance can result in heavy penalties and operational restrictions, making adherence to these standards not only environmentally responsible but also economically beneficial. With local and international pressure mounting on the mining industry to demonstrate environmental stewardship, effective wastewater management is essential for companies aiming to maintain a social license to operate.

In summary, wastewater treatment in mining is not merely a regulatory requirement; it is a strategic approach to conserving water, protecting the environment, and ensuring operational sustainability. The mining industry can significantly reduce its ecological footprint through robust wastewater management while supporting long-term resource conservation and regulatory compliance.

This article examines wastewater treatment technologies that actively address the environmental and operational challenges faced by the mining industry. With its heavy water consumption and significant wastewater output, mining poses unique challenges for sustainable water management, particularly in regions with limited water resources. Effective wastewater management is becoming essential as mining companies are held to higher environmental stewardship and resource efficiency standards, with local communities and regulatory bodies expecting stringent water quality compliance.

The article will explore wastewater treatment technologies to address a commonly overlooked wastewater source at mines: sewerage. This wastewater stream is easily neglected because it is typically handled by the municipality where the mining operations are located. In this case, sewerage wastewater is not a cause for concern, but it is an untapped source of reusable water that reduces the overall water footprint of the operations. Furthermore, in remote or undeveloped, mineral-rich regions, sewerage poses an environmental problem and a health risk to the personnel of the mining operations.

Beyond environmental benefits, sewerage wastewater technologies, such as the modular system shown in Figure 2, can also enhance operational efficiency. By reusing treated water in mining processes, companies can significantly reduce freshwater procurement costs and dependence on regional water supplies—a crucial advantage in arid mining regions. Moreover, proven and new modular treatment methods enable companies to comply more easily with water quality regulations, reducing the risk of legal repercussions and costly fines associated with non-compliance. Ultimately, adopting these technologies is more than a means to meet regulatory demands; it’s a forward-thinking strategy to enhance resource efficiency and support sustainable mining practices for the future. This article will provide insights into how mining companies can integrate these solutions to achieve greater sustainability and resilience in water-scarce environments.

Figure 2: Maskam Water’s Clarus Fusion wastewater treatment plant being installed [8].

1. Mining-Related Water Challenges and the Importance of Wastewater Treatment

Overview of Water Usage in Mining Operations

Water plays an integral role in virtually every stage of the mining process, making it a critical resource for operational efficiency and productivity. Its applications span from extraction to post-processing, with each stage requiring specific quantities and water quality to ensure optimal performance. Understanding how water is utilized in mining operations highlights its importance and underscores the need for sustainable water management practices [9].

One of the most significant uses of water in mining is ore processing, where it is required in large volumes. Water is a medium for separating valuable minerals from waste rock during this stage. Flotation, leaching, and milling depend heavily on water to carry and transport ore, dissolve chemical reagents, and ensure smooth operations. For example, water forms a slurry with finely ground ore in flotation, allowing valuable minerals to attach to bubbles and separate from waste materials. Similarly, leaching processes, such as cyanidation in gold mining, rely on water to dissolve and extract minerals.

Dust control is another critical area where water is essential. Mining operations, particularly open-pit mining, generate significant amounts of dust from activities like blasting, drilling, and transporting materials. If not managed effectively, this dust can pose health risks to workers and nearby communities and contribute to air pollution. Water is sprayed on haul roads, stockpiles, and active mining areas to suppress dust and maintain air quality, ensuring safer working conditions and reduced environmental impact.

Additionally, equipment cooling is an often overlooked but vital water application in mining. Large-scale machinery, such as crushers, conveyors, and grinding mills, generates substantial heat during operation. Cooling water is circulated through these systems to prevent overheating, reduce wear and tear, and enhance equipment longevity. In underground mines, water is also used to cool and ventilate working areas, ensuring safe temperatures for workers and equipment.

Beyond these primary applications, water is used for auxiliary purposes, such as firefighting, transporting tailings to storage facilities, and cleaning mining equipment. Given the diverse and extensive water use in mining, the industry must implement efficient water management strategies to minimize wastage, reduce environmental impact, and ensure a sustainable supply for critical operations.

Mining is inherently water-intensive, with vast water required at various stages, including ore processing, dust suppression, and equipment cooling. While essential to operations, these processes create significant resource conservation and environmental protection challenges. As global water scarcity intensifies and ecological regulations grow stricter, addressing the impact of mining’s water use and wastewater output has become a critical priority for the industry.

Water-intensive mining processes, such as milling, flotation, and leaching, generate substantial wastewater, often contaminated with heavy metals, chemicals, and suspended solids. If not properly managed, untreated mining wastewater can pose serious risks to ecosystems and surrounding communities. Contaminants like arsenic, mercury, and cyanide are toxic and can persist in the environment, accumulating in water bodies and soils, affecting biodiversity and public health. Additionally, acidic wastewater, a common byproduct in mining, can lower the pH of natural water sources, exacerbating the degradation of aquatic ecosystems [10].

The environmental impact extends beyond water pollution. Improperly handled wastewater can lead to tailings dam failures, releasing large volumes of contaminated water and sediment into nearby areas. Such events cause ecological disasters, damage the mining industry’s reputation, and result in costly legal and operational repercussions.

Mining wastewater often includes heavy metals like arsenic, mercury, and chemical residues from processing agents. These contaminants are highly toxic, even at low concentrations, and can persist in the environment for extended periods. When discharged untreated, mining wastewater can infiltrate natural water systems, leading to the bioaccumulation of harmful substances in aquatic life and plants. Over time, these contaminants move up the food chain, potentially impacting human health by consuming polluted water or food sources.

Another critical issue is the presence of cyanide, which is widely used in gold mining to leach precious metals. While effective for extraction, cyanide is highly toxic to both terrestrial and aquatic organisms. Its release into natural water bodies can result in severe ecological disruptions, including decimating aquatic populations and biodiversity loss.

Acidic wastewater, commonly called acid mine drainage (AMD), is another major byproduct of mining. When sulfide minerals in exposed rock react with oxygen and water, AMD has a significantly low pH, making it highly corrosive. When this acidic water enters rivers or groundwater, it can drastically alter the water’s chemistry, rendering it uninhabitable for most aquatic species, as shown in Figure 3. Furthermore, AMD often mobilizes additional heavy metals, compounding its environmental impact.

Figure 3: AMD outside a mine in South Africa [9].

The risks posed by untreated mining wastewater extend beyond environmental damage. Contaminated water sources can lead to long-term social and economic consequences for nearby communities, such as reduced access to clean drinking water, health crises, and diminished agricultural productivity. These issues and growing regulatory pressures emphasize the urgent need for mining companies to prioritize wastewater treatment.

Challenges Specific to South African Mines

South Africa’s mining industry, a cornerstone of the nation’s economy, faces a significant challenge in balancing its high water demand with its limited water availability. This issue is particularly pronounced in arid mining regions, where water scarcity is a daily reality and competition for this vital resource is intense. Addressing these water-related challenges has become a priority for mining operations to remain viable and environmentally responsible.

South Africa is classified as a water-scarce country, with an average annual rainfall far below the global average. Many of its richest mining regions, such as the Northern Cape, lie in arid or semi-arid zones with minimal water resources. The mining industry’s reliance on water for milling, flotation, and dust suppression exacerbates this scarcity, placing additional pressure on already stressed water systems.

Compounding the issue is the variability of water availability due to seasonal fluctuations and prolonged droughts. For example, mining operations may experience reduced water supply during dry seasons or face restrictions local authorities impose during severe droughts. These disruptions can halt critical operations, affecting productivity and profitability. Moreover, competition for water between mines and local communities often creates tensions, particularly in regions where communities depend on shared water sources for their livelihood.

The environmental footprint of high water consumption adds another layer of complexity. Large-scale water abstraction for mining can deplete aquifers and disrupt local ecosystems. This is particularly concerning in ecologically sensitive areas, where water loss affects biodiversity and regional hydrology.

South African mines are increasingly adopting innovative water management strategies to address these challenges. Techniques such as water recycling, advanced wastewater treatment, and the use of non-potable water sources are gaining traction. For instance, closed-loop systems that allow the reuse of treated wastewater within mining operations can significantly reduce freshwater intake. Additionally, reverse osmosis and membrane filtration ensure that recycled water meets the quality standards required for industrial use.

Another solution gaining momentum is investing in infrastructure to capture and store rainwater. By harnessing seasonal rainfall, mines can reduce their reliance on municipal water supplies and mitigate the impact of droughts. To address these challenges effectively, South African mines must balance operational efficiency with environmental stewardship. By leveraging innovative technologies and fostering collaboration, the mining industry can mitigate water scarcity risks and contribute to sustainable water management in a resource-limited environment.

Mining operations generate significant volumes of wastewater containing high contaminants, making effective water management critical for environmental and regulatory compliance. To address these challenges, South African authorities have implemented stringent regulations to control water pollution. The National Water Act mandates that mining companies take proactive steps to minimize their environmental impact by treating wastewater and responsibly managing water resources. Non-compliance can result in heavy fines, operational restrictions, and reputational damage, making adherence to these regulations both an environmental and business imperative [12].

Beyond regulatory compliance, these solutions enable mining operations to conserve water through recycling and reuse, reducing their reliance on freshwater supplies in water-scarce regions. This aligns with sustainability goals and enhances operational efficiency by lowering water procurement costs and mitigating supply risks. South Africa’s mining industry stands at the intersection of environmental responsibility and regulatory enforcement. By prioritizing effective wastewater treatment and adopting innovative technologies, mining companies can address the dual challenges of contaminant management and regulatory compliance, contributing to a more sustainable and resilient future for the sector.

The Role of Wastewater Treatment

Wastewater treatment is critical to sustainable water management and offers significant environmental, economic, and operational benefits. Industries and municipalities can reduce environmental damage by effectively treating and reclaiming wastewater, conserving limited freshwater resources, and improving overall resource efficiency. In regions like South Africa, where water scarcity is a persistent challenge, wastewater recycling, and reuse provide a viable solution to address growing water demands while minimizing ecological impact.

One of the primary benefits of wastewater treatment is its ability to mitigate environmental damage caused by untreated effluents. Whether from industrial processes, mining operations, or municipal sewerage systems, untreated wastewater often contains harmful contaminants, including heavy metals, pathogens, and organic pollutants. These substances can pollute rivers, aquifers, and soil, disrupting ecosystems and posing risks to public health, as shown in Figure 4 [13]. Wastewater recycling and reuse further amplify the benefits of treatment by transforming waste into a valuable resource. Treated wastewater can be reclaimed for various applications, including industrial processes, agricultural irrigation, and even potable water production in specific scenarios. In water-scarce regions, this approach significantly reduces dependency on freshwater sources, enabling industries and communities to operate sustainably. Recycling wastewater conserves limited water resources and lowers procurement and operational costs, offering an economic advantage to water-intensive sectors like mining, manufacturing, and agriculture.

Figure 4: Raw sewerage flowing into the Vaal River [14].

Sewerage wastewater, in particular, holds immense potential for reuse. Municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) can convert domestic sewage into high-quality reclaimed water through sedimentation, biological treatment, and disinfection processes. This treated water can be repurposed for non-potable uses, such as irrigation, cooling systems, and even some industrial applications, reducing the strain on potable water supplies. Additionally, sewerage treatment plants can recover valuable byproducts like biogas and biosolids, which can be used as energy sources and fertilizers, contributing to circular economy principles.

Implementing wastewater reuse strategies also aligns with broader sustainability goals, including reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with water transport and supporting resilient water management systems in the face of climate change. For engineers and water management professionals, adopting and optimizing these technologies represents a practical and forward-thinking response to the dual challenges of water scarcity and environmental stewardship.

In conclusion, wastewater treatment and recycling are no longer optional but essential to a sustainable water future. By integrating on-site sewerage wastewater treatment technologies and reusing treated sewerage water, the mining industry can reduce their environmental footprint, enhance resource efficiency, and build resilience against water scarcity. This approach addresses immediate water challenges and ensures long-term sustainability in a resource-constrained world.

2. Sewerage Wastewater Treatment Technologies

Packaged on-site wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) are compact, modular solutions for treating sewage water at locations where centralized sewer systems are unavailable or impractical. These systems employ various treatment technologies to meet environmental discharge standards and often integrate several processes for optimal performance. A complete WWTP would start with a primary treatment, typically utilizing physical processes such as screening and sedimentation to remove large debris and settleable solids from the incoming wastewater (influent). Grease and oil traps generally are part of the first line of defense and aim to capture fats, oils, and greases (FOG) that can interfere with downstream biological processes. [14].

The technologies most commonly used for performing secondary treatment of municipal wastewater rely on microorganisms suspended in the wastewater to treat it. Although these technologies work well in many situations, they have several drawbacks, including the difficulty of growing the right types of microorganisms and the physical requirement of a large site. Biological activity can be used in various approaches to break down harmful nutrients and compounds present in wastewater, as shown in Figure 5where a small-footprint unit is installed to treat sewerage from a nearby wine farm. Activated sludge systems use aeration tanks to encourage microbial activity to break down organic matter. Sequencing batch reactors (SBR) perform aeration, sedimentation, and decanting in cycles within a single tank. Trickling filters allow wastewater to flow over a media bed where microbial biofilms degrade organic contaminants. Membrane bioreactors (MBR) combine biological treatment with filtration for high-quality effluent. Moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBR) use plastic media for biofilm growth, increasing microbial activity in smaller spaces.

Figure 5: Kaackai’s packaged WWTP [15].

Tertiary treatment employs a variety of advanced processes to improve the final quality of the effluent, depending on the requirements of the use case. A standard tertiary treatment is filtration, where sand or multimedia filters remove the remaining suspended solids. Furthermore, disinfection by ultraviolet (UV) light, chlorination, or ozonation helps eliminate any remaining pathogens in the water. Finally, nutrient removal can be employed through processes like denitrification and phosphorus precipitation to address specific cases of high levels of nutrient pollution.

Finally, sludge management is required in all biological and sedimentation processes to address the constant build-up of sludge as a by-product. Dewatering units, such as filter presses, reduce sludge volume for more straightforward disposal of a dry product. Composting or anaerobic digestion can aid in the beneficiation of sludge into reusable products such as biogas or fertilizer.

Primary Treatment

Primary treatment constitutes the initial stage in the wastewater treatment continuum, wherein raw sewage is subjected to physical processes designed to extract coarse and settleable materials. This initial phase is pivotal in safeguarding downstream treatment infrastructure, diminishing the organic load, and augmenting the system’s overall efficiency. Central to primary treatment are screening and sedimentation processes executed with precision to achieve optimal results.

Screening represents the initial barrier in the treatment sequence, tasked with extracting sizable solids and debris from the influent wastewater. These extraneous materials, which may encompass plastics, textiles, wood fragments, and miscellaneous detritus, pose significant risks to subsequent treatment equipment through clogging or mechanical damage. Key components of the screening process include:

• Bar Screens: These structures comprise parallel bars oriented vertically or at an incline, as shown in Figure 6, where wastewater flows while entrapping larger debris. Bar spacing is calibrated to specific applications, ranging from coarse screens (25-75 mm spacing) to fine screens with apertures as narrow as 6 mm.

 

Figure 6: Bar Screens at a WWTP [17].

• Mechanical Screens: Equipped with automated cleaning mechanisms, mechanical screens ensure continuous debris removal, obviating manual intervention and maintaining uninterrupted operation.

Figure 7: Mechanical screens that roll up to deposit screenings for drying [17].

• Trash Racks: These devices capture substantial objects at the treatment plant’s ingress, thereby pre-empting damage to finer screening systems.

Figure 8: Trash racks trap mainly large items at the inlet into a WWTP [19].

The detritus intercepted during screening, colloquially termed “screenings,” is subjected to subsequent washing, compaction, and disposal processes, typically via landfilling or incineration. Advanced screening systems may use shredders to mash coarse materials, facilitating downstream handling and management.

Sedimentation leverages gravitational principles to segregate settleable solids from the wastewater matrix. This process is conducted within sedimentation tanks or clarifiers, meticulously engineered to provide sufficient retention time and minimize hydraulic disturbances that could impede settling. Significant features of sedimentation include:

• Tank Design: Sedimentation tanks are conventionally rectangular or circular, with conically sloped bottoms engineered to enhance sludge collection. Design parameters, such as hydraulic retention times of 2-4 hours, are optimized to achieve efficient solids separation.
• Settling Mechanics: Governed by Stoke’s Law, the sedimentation process is predicated on the relationship between particle size, density, and water viscosity. Properly calibrated design ensures the effective removal of suspended solids.
• Scum Removal: Buoyant materials, including grease and oils, ascend to the surface and are mechanically skimmed, thereby preventing interference with subsequent processes.
• Sludge Management: Accumulated solids, termed primary sludge, are systematically extracted and subjected to downstream treatments such as anaerobic digestion or mechanical dewatering.

An additional crucial primary treatment step is the effective removal of fats, oils, and greases (FOG), which is paramount to maintaining the integrity and efficiency of treatment systems. FOG compounds, predominantly from food service establishments, can solidify and accumulate within pipelines, leading to obstructions and impairing subsequent biological treatment processes. Implementing grease and oil traps, commonly called grease interceptors, is a standard practice to mitigate these challenges.

Grease interceptors are engineered to decelerate wastewater flow, facilitating the cooling of the effluent. This reduction in temperature induces the separation of FOG constituents, which ascend to form a surface layer due to their lower specific gravity, while denser particulates settle as sludge. The clarified intermediate liquid is discharged into the sewer system, reducing the downstream FOG load.

The structural design of grease interceptors typically encompasses:

• Inlet and Outlet Baffles: These components attenuate hydraulic turbulence, promoting quiescent conditions conducive to phase separation.
• Retention Capacity: Adequate volumetric capacity ensures sufficient residence time for effective stratification of FOG and solids.
• Access Ports: Strategically positioned openings facilitate routine inspection and maintenance operations.

Grease interceptors are categorized based on their operational mechanisms and installation contexts:

1. Hydromechanical Grease Interceptors (HGI): These units employ hydromechanical principles, often augmented with air entrainment and internal baffling, to expedite FOG separation. Their compact footprint renders them suitable for installation proximal to the source of FOG generation, such as beneath sinks. HGIs are typically rated by flow rate and separation efficiency, adhering to standards such as ASME A112.14.3.

Figure 9: HGI functioning principle and internal design [20].

1. Gravity Grease Interceptors (GGI): GGIs, which are characterized by larger capacities, rely on gravity-induced separation, providing extended detention times to facilitate FOG removal. Constructed from materials like concrete or fiberglass, these interceptors are generally installed underground, external to the facility. They are designed with multiple compartments and require regular maintenance to prevent FOG accumulation.

Figure 10: GGI can handle larger flow rates and are better suited to commercial applications [21].

1. Automatic Grease Removal Devices (AGRD): Integrating mechanical or electrical components, AGRDs continuously or periodically extract accumulated FOG, depositing it into a separate container for disposal or recycling. This automation minimizes manual maintenance and enhances operational efficiency. These systems, however, are limited to small applications at or near to where the wastewater is being generated, like under sinks in large commercial kitchens.

Figure 11: an AGRD installed underneath kitchen sinks [22].

The efficacy of grease interceptors depends on systematic maintenance protocols. Scheduled removal of accumulated FOG and solids is imperative to preserve interceptor functionality and prevent overflows. Routine assessments ensure structural integrity and identify potential issues such as corrosion or blockages. Maintaining detailed records of cleaning and inspection activities facilitates compliance with regulatory mandates and informs maintenance strategies.

Secondary Treatment

Activated Sludge Systems

Activated sludge systems are a cornerstone of biological wastewater treatment. They employ aeration tanks and a concentrated microbial community to decompose organic pollutants in wastewater [23]. These systems are widely implemented due to their efficiency in removing biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and organic matter, making them suitable for municipal and industrial wastewater treatment. The following sections delve into their working principles, characteristics, technical sizing considerations, advantages, and limitations.

The activated sludge process introduces wastewater into an aeration tank where air or oxygen is supplied to maintain aerobic conditions, as shown in Figure 12. Microorganisms in the mixed liquor metabolize the organic pollutants, converting them into biomass (new microbial cells), water, and carbon dioxide. The treated water flows into a secondary clarifier, where the biomass settles as sludge. A portion of this sludge, called return-activated sludge (RAS), is recirculated back to the aeration tank to maintain a high concentration of active microorganisms. Excess sludge (waste-activated sludge (WAS) is periodically removed for further treatment or disposal.

Figure 12: Aerated water inside an activated sludge system [24]

The effectiveness of the process hinges on parameters such as dissolved oxygen levels, hydraulic retention time (HRT), sludge retention time (SRT), and the food-to-microorganism (F/M) ratio. These parameters are carefully controlled to optimize microbial activity and ensure the efficient breakdown of organic matter.

Activated sludge systems are characterized by:

• Biological Mechanisms: The system relies on a consortium of bacteria, protozoa, and metazoans that work synergistically to degrade organic compounds and stabilize the wastewater.
• Continuous Flow: Wastewater is treated continuously, making the system suitable for handling large volumes.
• Aeration Requirements: Adequate aeration is critical to maintain the metabolic activity of aerobic microorganisms. This is achieved through diffused air systems, surface aerators, or jet aerators.
• Effluent Quality: These systems can achieve high-quality effluent with significant reductions in BOD, total suspended solids (TSS), and ammonia.

Designing an activated sludge system involves several critical factors to ensure optimal performance:

• Aeration Tank Volume: This is determined by the influent flow rate and desired HRT, which typically ranges from 4 to 8 hours.
• Dissolved Oxygen (DO): Maintained between 1-3 mg/L to sustain microbial activity without excessive energy consumption.
• Sludge Volume Index (SVI): Used to evaluate sludge settling characteristics and determine the required secondary clarifier capacity.
• SRT and F/M Ratio: SRT typically ranges from 3-15 days, while the F/M ratio is kept between 0.2-0.5 kg BOD/kg MLVSS/day for conventional systems.
• Secondary Clarifier Design: Sized based on surface overflow rates (SORs) to ensure efficient solids-liquid separation.

Activated sludge systems offer several advantages, making them widely used in wastewater treatment. They are known for their high efficiency, achieving biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) removal rates exceeding 85-95%, making them highly effective for treating organic pollutants. These systems are also adaptable and capable of handling various wastewater characteristics, including high-strength industrial effluents. Their scalability allows them to be implemented in small-scale treatment facilities and large municipal plants, providing flexibility for different operational needs. Furthermore, activated sludge systems can be modified for nutrient removal, effectively reducing nitrogen and phosphorus levels when integrated with advanced biological nutrient removal (BNR) processes, enhancing their environmental performance.

Despite these benefits, activated sludge systems come with notable challenges. They are energy-intensive, with aeration processes consuming significant operational energy, which can impact overall cost efficiency. These systems also generate substantial amounts of waste-activated sludge, necessitating additional treatment and disposal efforts. Moreover, they exhibit operational sensitivity, requiring careful monitoring and control of parameters to prevent common issues such as filamentous bulking, sludge carryover, or system failures. Finally, traditional designs often have significant space requirements, as secondary clarifiers and associated equipment can occupy large areas, which may limit their applicability in space-constrained settings. These considerations must be addressed to maximize the efficiency and sustainability of activated sludge systems.

Activated sludge systems represent a robust and versatile solution for biological wastewater treatment. Their ability to achieve high effluent quality and adaptability to diverse waste streams make them a popular choice for engineers. However, the systems require careful design, operation, and maintenance to address energy demands, sludge handling, and potential process disruptions. Advances in aeration technology, process automation, and integrated treatment approaches continue to enhance the efficiency and sustainability of activated sludge systems.

Sequencing Batch Reactors

Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBRs) are activated sludge processes operating in discrete time-controlled cycles within a single tank. These systems are gaining traction due to their flexibility and ability to perform multiple treatment stages in the same vessel, including aeration, sedimentation, and decanting. This batch approach offers distinct advantages in terms of process control and footprint reduction, making SBRs suitable for small to medium-sized wastewater treatment facilities and systems with variable flow rates or loads. Below is a detailed discussion on their working principle, characteristics, technical sizing considerations, advantages, and limitations [25].

SBR systems treat wastewater through a sequence of time-based operational phases, typically including a filling, reaction, settling, decanting and idle stage, as shown in Figure 13.

1. Fill: Wastewater is introduced into the reactor, either as a single batch or intermittently. This phase may involve pre-aeration to mix the influent and improve biological contact.
2. React (Aeration): During this phase, air is supplied to promote biological degradation of organic matter and nitrification. Microbial activity converts soluble organic pollutants into biomass, carbon dioxide, and nitrogenous compounds.
3. Settle: After aeration ceases, the reactor enters a quiescent state, allowing solids to settle by gravity. This phase is critical for achieving clear separation between treated effluent and the sludge blanket.
4. Decant: The clarified supernatant is carefully removed from the top of the tank using a decanter or other specialized mechanism to avoid disturbing the settled sludge.
5. Idle: Some systems include an idle phase to provide operational flexibility before the next cycle begins.

Figure 13: Schematic diagram of the five steps in the SBR process [26].

Characteristics

Sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) are characterized by their batch operation, which processes wastewater in discrete cycles rather than the continuous flow typical of conventional systems. This unique approach allows for greater control over treatment stages. An SBR utilizes a single-tank design, integrating aeration, clarification, and decanting within the same reactor. This multifunctional setup simplifies infrastructure requirements and reduces the overall system footprint. The system also offers flexible configuration, as the durations of operational phases—such as aeration, settling, and decanting—can be adjusted to accommodate varying influent conditions and specific treatment goals, including biological nutrient removal. Modern SBRs incorporate automated control systems with programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and advanced sensors, enabling precise management and optimization of the treatment process to ensure consistent performance.

The design and sizing of an SBR system depend on several factors:

• Tank Volume: Determined by influent flow rate, organic load, and required hydraulic retention time (HRT). A typical SBR cycle may range from 4 to 12 hours.
• Aeration Requirements: To support microbial activity, dissolved oxygen levels are maintained at 2-3 mg/L during the react phase. Airflow rates are sized based on the oxygen demand of the influent.
• Settling Zone: The reactor must allow sufficient depth and quiescent conditions for effective solids settling during the settle phase.
• Decanting Mechanism: Decanters are sized and designed to remove clarified effluent without disturbing settled sludge.
• Peak Flow Management: Idle phases or multiple tanks may be necessary to handle flow variations and avoid overloading during peak conditions.

SBRs offer several advantages, particularly in terms of their compact design, which integrates multiple treatment processes—such as aeration, settling, and decanting—into a single tank. This design minimizes space requirements and reduces construction costs. SBRs also provide process flexibility, with adjustable cycle parameters that allow operators to tailor treatment processes to specific influent characteristics or regulatory standards. Their ability to achieve high-quality effluent makes them suitable for stringent discharge requirements, effectively removing biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), and nutrients. Additionally, SBRs are particularly cost-effective for smaller plants, such as those serving small communities or industries, as their batch operation eliminates the need for separate clarifiers.

However, SBRs also have limitations. The batch operation may restrict their applicability in facilities with extremely high or continuous inflow rates, where consistent processing is essential. Their operational complexity necessitates advanced control systems and skilled operators to manage phase transitions and maintain optimal treatment efficiency. Furthermore, the energy demand during the aeration phase can contribute to higher operational costs. Like other activated sludge processes, SBRs require regular sludge management, as excess sludge must be periodically removed, treated, and disposed of. Finally, equipment wear, particularly in components like decanters, can increase maintenance needs over time.

SBRs represent an innovative and adaptable solution for wastewater treatment, combining efficiency with operational flexibility. While they offer significant benefits for small to medium-scale applications, their successful implementation relies on careful design, advanced automation, and skilled operation. With ongoing advancements in sensor technologies and process optimization, SBR systems are poised to remain a competitive choice for modern wastewater treatment challenges.

Trickling Filters

Trickling filters are an established biological treatment technology widely used in wastewater treatment to remove organic contaminants. This process utilizes a fixed-film approach where wastewater is distributed over a media bed that supports the growth of a microbial biofilm [27]. These biofilms metabolize and break down organic matter as the wastewater flows through the filter. Trickling filters are valued for their simplicity, robustness, and effectiveness in achieving secondary treatment standards. Below, the working principle, characteristics, technical sizing considerations, advantages, and limitations of trickling filters are discussed.

The core of a trickling filter system is the media bed, which provides a surface for microbial growth. The process follows these steps:

1. Wastewater Distribution: Raw or partially treated wastewater is uniformly distributed over the filter media through rotary or fixed arm distributors.
2. Biofilm Activity: As the wastewater trickles over the media, it contacts a microbial biofilm composed of bacteria, protozoa, and fungi. These microorganisms metabolize organic matter, converting it into biomass, carbon dioxide, and water.
3. Air Circulation: Natural or forced air movement through the media ensures aerobic conditions, critical for efficient biological activity.
4. Effluent Collection: Treated wastewater exits the bottom of the filter, where it is collected and directed to secondary clarifiers for further treatment.

The microbial biofilm undergoes a self-regulating cycle of growth, nutrient consumption, and sloughing, maintaining an active and effective biological treatment layer.

Trickling filters operate as a fixed-film process, where microorganisms grow on a stationary surface rather than being suspended in the wastewater, as is the case in activated sludge systems. The choice of media plays a significant role in system performance. Traditional filters commonly use rock or gravel, while modern designs often incorporate lightweight synthetic materials, such as plastic media, which provide a much larger surface area for microbial growth and enhanced structural stability. The system maintains an aerobic environment, with airflow typically facilitated by natural convection or, in some cases, forced ventilation to optimize oxygen availability for microbial activity, as shown in Figure 14. One of the defining characteristics of trickling filters is their low energy demand, as they rely on gravity for wastewater flow, making them more energy-efficient than many other biological treatment systems.

Figure 14: The basic working principle of a trickling filter [28].

Technical Sizing Considerations

The performance of a trickling filter depends on proper design and sizing, which account for:

• Hydraulic Loading Rate (HLR): The volume of wastewater applied per unit area of the filter, typically expressed in m³/m²/day. This rate determines the contact time between the wastewater and the biofilm.
• Organic Loading Rate (OLR): The mass of organic matter (BOD) applied per unit volume of the media, usually expressed in kg BOD/m³/day. Optimal OLRs ensure microbial efficiency without overloading the system.
• Media Depth and Surface Area: Depths typically range from 1 to 3 meters, with high-surface-area synthetic media providing greater treatment capacity in compact footprints.
• Recirculation Ratio: Recirculating a portion of the treated effluent can improve process stability by maintaining consistent hydraulic and organic loading.
• Ventilation: Adequate air exchange is essential to prevent anaerobic conditions and maintain biofilm activity.

Trickling filters offer several advantages, particularly their energy efficiency, as they consume significantly less energy compared to systems like activated sludge, especially when utilizing natural aeration. Their operational simplicity makes them easy to operate and maintain, making them an excellent choice for remote or resource-limited locations. Additionally, the resilience of the fixed biofilm ensures stable performance even during fluctuations in hydraulic or organic loads, unlike suspended-growth systems. With proper design and maintenance, trickling filters demonstrate remarkable longevity, often operating reliably for decades with minimal mechanical wear.

However, these systems also have limitations. Traditional rock media filters require a large footprint, although modern synthetic media designs help reduce space requirements. Clogging risks from accumulated biomass and debris can reduce efficiency and necessitate periodic cleaning or backwashing. Seasonal variations in temperature can also impact performance, with colder conditions slowing microbial activity. While trickling filters effectively remove BOD, their effluent quality may fall short of stringent nutrient or turbidity standards, requiring additional post-treatment processes. Furthermore, without proper ventilation, the decomposition of organic matter can lead to odor generation, posing challenges in certain applications.

Trickling filters remain a reliable and cost-effective solution for biological wastewater treatment, particularly in settings where energy efficiency and simplicity are prioritized. Advances in media design and operational strategies have enhanced their performance and applicability, making them a competitive option for both municipal and industrial applications. However, carefully considering design and operational parameters is essential to address potential challenges and optimize long-term performance.

Membrane Bioreactors

Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) are an advanced wastewater treatment technology that integrates biological treatment with membrane filtration [29]. This hybrid approach combines the benefits of activated sludge processes with the precision of physical filtration, resulting in high-quality effluent that meets or exceeds stringent discharge and reuse standards. MBRs are suited for compact design applications, superior treatment efficiency, and water reclamation capabilities.

The MBR process begins with the biological degradation of organic matter in an aeration tank. Similar to conventional activated sludge systems, microorganisms metabolize pollutants, producing biomass and converting soluble contaminants into stable end products such as carbon dioxide and water.

After biological treatment, the mixed liquor is transferred to a membrane module, as shown in Figure 15, where filtration occurs. Membrane units, typically microfiltration (MF) or ultrafiltration (UF), act as a physical barrier, retaining suspended solids, microorganisms, and pathogens. The resulting permeate is a clear, high-quality effluent that can be directly reused or further polished for specialized applications. Key elements of the working principle include:

• Biological Degradation: Aerobic or anaerobic microbial processes remove organic matter and nutrients.
• Membrane Separation: Physical filtration eliminates suspended solids and pathogens, replacing conventional secondary clarifiers.
• Air Scouring: Air is periodically introduced to clean the membrane surface and minimize fouling.

Figure 15: Diagram of the steps in a MBR [30].

Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs) are characterized by their ability to integrate biological and physical treatment within a single system, offering streamlined operations and a reduced overall footprint. By operating at higher mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) levels than conventional treatment systems, MBRs achieve enhanced treatment capacity and performance. Their compact design eliminates the need for secondary clarifiers, further reducing the system’s space requirements. Additionally, MBRs incorporate automated operation, with advanced control systems that monitor membrane performance, manage cleaning cycles, and optimize process efficiency, making them a highly efficient and user-friendly solution for wastewater treatment.

Technical Sizing Considerations

MBR system design and sizing depend on several critical parameters:

• Membrane Surface Area: Determines filtration capacity and is sized based on influent flow rates and required effluent quality.
• Flux Rate: Represents the flow of water per unit area of membrane, typically expressed in liters per square meter per hour (LMH). Appropriate flux rates are chosen to balance efficiency and fouling potential.
• MLSS Levels: Operates at high MLSS concentrations (10,000–15,000 mg/L) to enhance treatment efficiency while minimizing the volume of aeration tanks.
• Aeration Requirements: Airflow is essential for biological processes and for scouring membranes to prevent fouling.
• Membrane Cleaning: Chemical cleaning protocols are incorporated to address fouling and scaling, ensuring long-term performance.

Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs) offer several advantages, including superior effluent quality, consistently producing water with low turbidity, minimal suspended solids, and reduced pathogen levels. This high-quality effluent is suitable for irrigation, industrial processes, and even potable reuse applications. Their space efficiency makes them ideal for urban environments or facilities with limited land availability. MBRs exhibit robust performance, maintaining stable operation and achieving high removal rates for BOD, TSS, and nutrients, even under fluctuating influent conditions. Additionally, their ease of scalability is a significant advantage, as modular membrane designs allow for straightforward expansion to meet increasing treatment demands.

However, MBRs also come with notable challenges. Their high energy demand for aeration and membrane filtration contributes to increased operational costs. Membrane fouling, caused by biofilm accumulation, scaling, or particulate matter, requires regular cleaning and maintenance to sustain performance. The capital costs of MBR systems are higher than those of conventional treatment technologies, though the investment can be offset by their reduced footprint and superior effluent quality over time. Furthermore, the high MLSS levels inherent to MBR operation result in greater sludge production, necessitating effective sludge management systems. Finally, the complexity of MBR systems, with their advanced automation and monitoring requirements, demands skilled operators and specialized maintenance personnel to ensure reliable performance.

Membrane bioreactors offer a state-of-the-art solution for wastewater treatment, achieving unparalleled effluent quality in a compact and flexible configuration. While the technology presents energy use and maintenance challenges, its benefits make it a compelling choice for municipalities and industries seeking sustainable water management solutions. Continued advancements in membrane materials and energy-efficient designs are likely to enhance further the feasibility and adoption of MBR systems in diverse applications.

Moving Bed Biofilm Reactors

Moving Bed Biofilm Reactors (MBBR) are a highly efficient biological wastewater treatment technology designed to maximize microbial activity within compact spaces. By utilizing plastic carrier media that provide a large surface area for biofilm attachment, MBBRs enhance biological processes, enabling the effective breakdown of organic matter and nutrients. Their modular and adaptable nature makes them suitable for various applications, including municipal wastewater treatment, industrial effluent processing, and retrofits for existing treatment systems.

The MBBR process relies on the growth of biofilms on specially designed plastic carrier media suspended within a reactor. These media are maintained in constant motion by aeration (in aerobic systems) or mechanical mixing (in anaerobic systems) [29]. The working principle involves:

1. Biofilm Formation: Microorganisms adhere to the surface of the carrier media, forming a biofilm. This biofilm houses a diverse microbial community that degrades organic matter and removes nutrients.
2. Wastewater Flow: As wastewater flows through the reactor, pollutants are metabolized by the microorganisms in the biofilm. The continuous movement of the media ensures uniform contact between the biofilm and the wastewater.
3. Self-Regulating Biofilm: The biofilm undergoes a natural cycle of growth and sloughing. Excess biomass is shed from the media and carried out of the reactor for removal during downstream clarification or filtration.
4. Aeration or Mixing: Aerobic systems rely on air diffusers to supply oxygen and keep the media in motion, while anaerobic or anoxic systems use mechanical mixers to maintain media circulation.

Their innovative media design defines moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs), typically made from durable materials like polyethylene or polypropylene. These media come in various shapes, such as cylindrical or hexagonal, to provide maximum surface area for biofilm growth while minimizing clogging and ensuring long-term durability. Carrier media, such as that shown in Figure 15, enables compact systems with high biomass retention, significantly reducing the reactor volume required for effective wastewater treatment. MBBRs are highly versatile and capable of operating under aerobic, anoxic, or anaerobic conditions, making them suitable for various applications, including biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) removal, nitrification, and denitrification. Additionally, MBBRs require minimal maintenance, eliminating the need for sludge recycling or mechanical biofilm support structures and simplifying operation and upkeep.

Figure 16: Illustration of the carrier media in an MBBR [30].

Technical Sizing Considerations

Designing an MBBR system requires careful attention to several parameters:

• Media Fill Ratio: Typically, 40-70% of the reactor volume is filled with media to ensure optimal mixing and contact between the biofilm and wastewater.
• Specific Surface Area: The effectiveness of the media depends on its surface area, measured in m²/m³. Higher specific surface areas increase the capacity for biofilm growth.
• Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT): Determined by the wastewater flow rate and reactor volume, HRT is critical for allowing sufficient time for biological processes.
• Aeration Rate: Aerobic systems require adequate oxygen transfer to sustain microbial activity and keep the media in motion. Aeration rates are typically designed to maintain dissolved oxygen levels above 2 mg/L.
• Temperature and pH: MBBRs are sensitive to operational conditions, with optimal microbial activity occurring within specific temperature (10–35°C) and pH (6.5–8.5) ranges.

Moving Bed Biofilm Reactors (MBBRs) offer several notable advantages. Their high treatment efficiency stems from the large surface area provided by the carrier media, which supports dense microbial populations, enabling the effective removal of organic matter and nutrients. The compact footprint of MBBRs, resulting from high biomass retention, makes them ideal for facilities with space constraints compared to conventional systems like activated sludge. Additionally, MBBRs generate low sludge volumes due to the self-regulating biofilm, which reduces sludge handling and disposal requirements. Their adaptability is another key advantage, as the modular design allows for easy scaling or retrofitting into existing treatment systems. Moreover, operational simplicity is achieved without sludge recirculation, simplifying system management and maintenance.

However, MBBRs also have certain drawbacks. Aerobic systems often face high aeration energy demands, as continuous aeration is needed for media movement and oxygen transfer. Improper design or maintenance can lead to media clogging, compromising system performance. While MBBRs excel in BOD and nutrient removal, achieving stringent effluent quality standards may require additional polishing processes, such as filtration. The capital costs for MBBR systems can be higher than those of conventional systems, primarily due to the specialized media and aeration equipment. Furthermore, temperature sensitivity can pose challenges, with significant performance reductions at low temperatures, particularly for nitrification processes.

MBBRs represent a robust and flexible solution for wastewater treatment, combining high efficiency with a compact and straightforward design. Their ability to handle variable loads and integrate into existing facilities makes them a valuable choice for municipal and industrial applications. Despite certain limitations, advancements in media design and aeration efficiency continue to enhance the feasibility and performance of MBBR systems, reinforcing their position as a reliable option for modern wastewater management.

Tertiary Treatment (Advanced Processes)

Tertiary treatment represents the final phase of wastewater treatment, focusing on advanced processes to polish effluent quality and ensure compliance with stringent environmental and reuse standards. This stage targets removing residual suspended solids, pathogens, and nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus, often not fully addressed during primary and secondary treatment. By employing a combination of filtration, disinfection, and nutrient removal technologies, tertiary treatment produces high-quality water suitable for discharge into sensitive environments or reuse applications [33].

Tertiary treatment involves a sequence of advanced processes tailored to meet specific effluent quality goals and follow the preceding primary screening and secondary biological treatment stages, as shown in Figure 17. Typically, effluent passes through sand or multimedia filters, where physical barriers capture fine suspended particles that escape earlier treatment stages. These filters may use sand, anthracite, and gravel layers for progressive filtration. Advanced systems may typically incorporate automatic backwashing mechanisms to maintain performance. The required flow rate and target removal efficiency determine the filtration surface area. Overloading a media filter can compromise performance, necessitating accurate flow and load calculations.

Figure 17: Schematic of the various steps (primary, secondary and tertiary, including sludge management) in wastewater treatment [34].

Popular disinfection methods include ultraviolet (UV) light or chlorination to neutralize pathogens. UV disinfection disrupts the DNA of microorganisms, rendering them incapable of replication. However, UV requires exposure of the water and the pathogens to this radiation within a chamber, limiting its efficacy to this immediate exposure. The UV dose is measured in millijoules per square centimeter (mJ/cm²), and must be sufficient to achieve the desired microbial inactivation, considering water turbidity and transmittance factors.

On the other hand, chlorination uses chemical reactions to destroy microbial cells, typically oxidation of the organisms’ cell membrane, resulting in their subsequent death. Chlorination has more of a prolonged disinfection mechanism in that its effects are still present after the dosing, allowing for further biological growth suppression. Despite this, it will still evaporate out of the water in time, requiring periodic dosing, depending on how long the water is stagnant before it is used or how far it must be distributed from the point of origin to the point of use.

Nutrient removal can be addressed through various processes, such as biological denitrification or chemical phosphorus precipitation [34]. Denitrification converts nitrate into nitrogen gas via microbial activity under anoxic conditions. At the same time, phosphorus precipitation uses coagulants (e.g., alum or ferric chloride) to form insoluble compounds that are removed as sludge. Precise dosing systems are essential for phosphorus precipitation to prevent excess chemical use and operational inefficiencies. For other processes like denitrification, sufficient hydraulic retention time is required to enable microbial conversion of nitrates to nitrogen gas.

Electrochemical treatment is an emerging technology that uses electric currents to treat wastewater by inducing chemical reactions to remove contaminants and disinfect the environment. Electrodes submerged in wastewater generate reactive species (e.g., hydroxyl radicals and chlorine species) that oxidize organic pollutants, precipitate heavy metals, and destroy pathogens. These systems are highly modular and highly efficacious in removing recalcitrant compounds. Electrochemical reactors can target specific pollutants by varying electrode materials and current densities. Reactor sizing depends on flow rates, pollutant concentrations, and required treatment time. Power consumption is key, with energy usage optimized through advanced electrode designs. Electrochemical treatment offers high treatment efficiencies, minimal chemical usage, and a small footprint. However, their high energy consumption and potential fouling or degradation of electrodes over time result in additional operational costs

Tertiary treatment focuses on refining effluent quality and reducing residual solids, pathogens, and nutrients to minimal levels. Such systems can be tailored to specific treatment goals, depending on the requirements of the final use case or discharge limits. Tertiary treatment steps are often integrated with existing treatment plants as a modular add-on to address changing regulatory or reuse requirements.

Depending on the final contaminants that need to be removed, specific advanced treatment processes may require significant energy inputs for UV lamps, pumping or aeration, and chemical additives.

Tertiary treatment achieves effluent clarity, pathogen reduction, and nutrient removal, assisting in meeting the most stringent discharge and reuse standards. This maximizes the reuse potential of wastewater recycling for irrigation, industrial processes, or even potable water production, contributing to sustainable water management. The modularity of tertiary processes means they can be implemented as standalone systems or retrofitted into existing treatment plants.

Such treatment additions increase the wastewater treatment plant’s overall energy intensity, requiring adequate planning for the total electrical supply to the system. The dependency on chemicals for processes like phosphorus precipitation contributes to recurring operational costs and potential secondary waste generation. Advanced systems such as UV lamps and filtration units require regular monitoring and maintenance to ensure consistent performance. Furthermore, the initial investment in tertiary treatment infrastructure can be substantial, particularly for high-capacity or specialized applications, and will dramatically increase the per-unit cost of the produced effluent.

Sludge Management

Effective sludge management is a critical component of wastewater treatment systems, addressing the byproducts of primary, secondary, and tertiary processes [36]. Sludge comprises organic and inorganic solids, pathogens, and water, necessitating specialized processes to reduce its volume, mitigate environmental impacts, and recover valuable resources. Key methods include dewatering, composting, and anaerobic digestion, each tailored to specific operational goals and regulatory frameworks.

Dewatering reduces the water content of sludge, significantly minimizing its volume to facilitate transportation and disposal. Technologies such as centrifuges, filter presses, and screw presses separate water from solids through mechanical processes. By exerting pressure or centrifugal forces, dewatering units extract free and bound water, producing a semi-solid cake that is easier to handle. These compact, mechanical systems provide rapid volume reduction and low operator involvement. Outputs range from 15-30% solids depending on the technology and sludge characteristics. The capacity of dewatering processes is based on sludge production rates, solid concentration, and target dryness levels. Equipment selection also considers operational factors like polymer dosing for flocculation and power requirements.

Composting or anaerobic digestion are natural, beneficiating options for sludge management, depending on the upstream treatment steps applied. Composting involves the aerobic degradation of organic matter in sludge. Microbial activity generates heat, stabilizing the material and converting it into nutrient-rich compost suitable for agricultural use. Specific conditions such as moisture content (50-60%), aeration, and carbon-to-nitrogen ratio are required for optimal microbial activity. Composting requires careful management of odor and leachate.

Anaerobic digestion is a biological process carried out in oxygen-free conditions. Microorganisms break down organic matter, producing biogas (a mixture of methane and carbon dioxide) and digestate. Biogas can be used as a renewable energy source, while digestate is a soil conditioner or fertilizer [37]. It functions effectively under mesophilic (30–40°C) or thermophilic (50–60°C) conditions, with the additional benefit of low-heat renewable energy generation. Such processes require sufficient retention time (typically 15-30 days) and a balance between organic loading rates and reactor volume. Gas collection and storage systems, as depicted in Figure ## must accommodate biogas production. Anaerobic digesters need precise monitoring to maintain microbial health and prevent process upsets.

Figure 18: Diagram of the basic functioning of a biodigester [38].

Emerging technologies are transforming wastewater treatment, focusing on decentralized and sustainable solutions that integrate environmental conservation with operational efficiency. Nature-based systems, such as constructed wetlands and green walls, leverage natural processes for decentralized wastewater treatment. These systems integrate physical, chemical, and biological mechanisms to purify water while enhancing ecosystem services. Wastewater flows through a planted bed of soil or gravel, where plants and microbial communities degrade organic pollutants, remove nutrients, and trap suspended solids [39]. Green walls utilize vertical vegetation structures with similar biofiltration functions.

Significant benefits of such systems are the minimal requirement for further energy, aesthetic integration, and the ability to treat low-strength wastewater. Constructed wetlands can be designed for horizontal or vertical flow depending on site constraints and treatment objectives. Surface area requirements depend on pollutant loads, retention times, and substrate hydraulic conductivity. Typical retention times range from 3 to 7 days for effective treatment.

3. Economic and Environmental Benefits of Wastewater Treatment in Mining

Wastewater treatment in mining operations is not only a regulatory requirement but also a strategic investment that delivers significant economic and environmental benefits. By implementing effective wastewater treatment technologies, mining companies can enhance operational efficiency, reduce costs, protect the environment, and contribute to sustainable resource management. Mining operations are water-intensive, relying on substantial volumes of water for activities such as mineral processing, dust suppression, and equipment cooling. Integrating wastewater treatment systems into these operations provides a cost-effective solution to water management challenges:

Treated wastewater can be reused for various on-site applications, reducing dependency on fresh water sources. This lowers operational costs associated with water extraction, transport, and procurement. In regions with high water tariffs or limited availability, such savings can be substantial. Effective wastewater treatment ensures adherence to environmental regulations, mitigating the risk of fines, penalties, or shutdowns due to non-compliance. This proactive approach can lead to improved operational stability and predictable budgeting.

Additionally, improved water efficiency through wastewater treatment supports the optimization of mining processes, reducing energy consumption and waste generation. These efficiency gains directly translate into financial benefits, enhancing the competitiveness of mining operations.

Mining activities profoundly impact surrounding ecosystems, with untreated wastewater posing risks to soil, water, and biodiversity. Wastewater treatment helps mitigate these risks while reinforcing mining companies’ commitment to environmental stewardship. Effective wastewater management is integral to fulfilling CSR objectives. It showcases a commitment to reducing the environmental footprint of mining operations, which can strengthen relationships with local communities, stakeholders, and regulatory authorities.

By adopting wastewater treatment technologies, mining companies contribute to preserving environmental integrity while aligning with global sustainability goals such as the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In water-stressed regions such as South Africa, the mining industry’s reliance on shared water resources often leads to competition with local communities and agricultural sectors. Wastewater treatment addresses these challenges by promoting resource sustainability and enhancing water security. Recycling and reusing treated water reduces the volume of freshwater withdrawals, ensuring reliable water availability for mining operations over the long term. This is particularly crucial in arid and semi-arid regions where water scarcity poses operational risks. Furthermore, where supply from municipal sources can be intermittent, posing a risk to mining operations, water reuse increases the mine’s security and uptime.

Through these efforts, packaged sewerage wastewater treatment contributes to a more sustainable mining industry that balances operational demands with environmental and social responsibilities. Integrating novel, modular wastewater treatment technologies in mining operations delivers a multifaceted return on investment. From significant cost savings and operational efficiencies to enhanced environmental protection and resource sustainability, wastewater treatment is a cornerstone of modern, responsible mining practices. As the industry faces increasing scrutiny and resource challenges, adopting advanced wastewater management solutions will remain critical to achieving long-term resilience and success.

Bibliography

[1]	[Online]. Available: https://www.mineralscouncil.org.za/reports/2023/downloads/mcsa-iar2023-our-context.pdf.
[2]	[Online]. Available: https://www.investsa.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/FACT-SHEET_MINING_2020.pdf.
[3]	[Online]. Available: https://academicjournals.org/app/webroot/article/article1380621809_Ochieng%20et%20al.pdf.
[4]	[Online]. Available: https://futures.issafrica.org/export/sites/afi/reports/pdfs/a-delicate-balance-water-scarcity-in-south-africa.pdf.
[5]	[Online]. Available: https://groundup.org.za/article/has-cape-town-planned-properly-day-zero/.
[6]	[Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960148118309832?via%3Dihub.
[7]	[Online]. Available: https://www.whyafrica.co.za/how-mines-can-improve-water-usage/.
[8]	[Online]. Available: https://www.cbn.co.za/industry-news/water-engineering/resolving-sas-water-crisis-be-part-of-the-solution/.
[9]	[Online]. Available: https://www.usgs.gov/mission-areas/water-resources/science/mining-water-use.
[10]	[Online]. Available: https://nuwater.com/water-treatment-in-the-mining-industry/.
[11]	[Online]. Available: https://www.environment.co.za/acid-mine-drainage-amd/acid-mine-drainage-managed-says-imc.html.
[12]	[Online]. Available: https://www.dws.gov.za/documents/publications/NWAguide.pdf.
[13]	[Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780323918930000092.
[14]	[Online]. Available: https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2020-01-31-contaminated-vaal-river-system-stabilised-but-rehabilitation-is-far-from-complete/.
[15]	[Online]. Available: https://www3.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/package_plant.pdf.
[16]	[Online]. Available: https://www.kaackai.com/faqs.
[17]	[Online]. Available: http://www.triplepointwater.com/lagoon-screens/manual-bar-screen-2/.
[18]	[Online]. Available: https://mavink.com/explore/Bar-Screens-Wastewater-Treatment-Plant.
[19]	[Online]. Available: https://theconstructor.org/water-resources/trash-racks/559412/.
[20]	[Online]. Available: https://www.drain-tech.com/grease-traps/15-to-50-gpm/grease-interceptor-100-lbs-50gpm/.
[21]	[Online]. Available: https://schierproducts.com/shop/gb-1500.
[22]	[Online]. Available: https://www.eboss.co.nz/library/aco-nz/goslyn-automatic-grease-removal-device.
[23]	[Online]. Available: https://rjwave.org/ijedr/papers/IJEDR1602156.pdf.
[24]	[Online]. Available: http://mail.aboutcivil.org/activated-sludge-process-system-for-wastewater-treatment.html.
[25]	[Online]. Available: https://www3.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/sbr_new.pdf.
[26]	[Online]. Available: https://elysianindustries.com/sequential-batch-reactor/.
[27]	[Online]. Available: https://www3.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/trickling_filter.pdf.
[28]	[Online]. Available: https://eec.oregonstate.edu/trickling-filters-biofilters.
[29]	[Online]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-08/documents/membrane_bioreactor_fact_sheet_p100il7g.pdf.
[30]	[Online]. Available: https://green.org/2024/01/30/membrane-bioreactors-mbrs-in-wastewater-treatment/.
[31]	[Online]. Available: https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jestft/papers/vol6-issue6/C0661521.pdf.
[32]	[Online]. Available: https://www.bioetp.com/moving-bed-biofilm-reactor-mbbr-media/.
[33]	[Online]. Available: https://www.racoman.com/blog/tertiary-filtration-wastewater-treatment-explained.
[34]	[Online]. Available: https://www.yasa.ltd/post/wastewater-treatment-for-treating-industrial-effluent-yasa-et-treatment-systems.
[35]	[Online]. Available: https://www.waterandwastewater.com/tertiary-treatment-in-wastewater-ensuring-water-quality-and-environmental-safety/.
[36]	[Online]. Available: https://theasengineers.com/ultimate-guide-to-tertiary-treatment-of-wastewater/.
[37]	[Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2589014X24000975.
[38]	[Online]. Available: https://powerknot.com/2023/05/01/biodigesters-environmental-friend-or-foe/.
[39]	[Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/10/6211.