SOLAR POWERED RAIN WATER HARVESTING SYSTEM

1 Introduction

1.1 Solar Powered Rainwater harvesting System: Background

Consideration for Solar Powered Rainwater harvesting System: South Africa has an estimated population of 54 million people with an estimated 40% of this population living in rural settlements1 (MIT, 2016) (Stats SA, 2016). 74% of the people living in these rural areas rely solely upon groundwater, which only accounts for 9% of the total water in use in South Africa, due to a lack of water infrastructure (MIT, 2016). 19% of the rural population does not have access to any clean water supply and 26% of schools, as well as 45% of clinics, have no water access either (MIT, 2016).

Rainwater is a clean source of water that can be harvested to solve the need for potable water in rural areas (About, Inc, 2017). Rainwater is regarded as a clean source of water due to its lack of contaminants and hard metals. The rainwater can become acidic depending on the location (EPA, 2017). Though the acidic part of rainwater is bad for metals and machinery, it is suitable for human consumption if filtered properly. The rainwater is polluted further by flowing from the catchment areas. Pollutants on these catchments areas include leaves, dust particles and droppings of various animals. Due to these pollutants, it is necessary to filter and purify the water according to the SANs 241-2015 standards, in order for the water to be classified as potable water (HarvestH2o, 2017).

Rural areas are often found in areas of the country where there is little to none infrastructure in terms of water and electricity supply (ETU, 2017). To overcome this a system design will have to be self-powered and automated.

1.2 Problem statement

Investigate the possibility that a rainwater harvesting system can provide reliable potable water for a rural household. System design is needed that does not require external power and is simplistic in operation. Test whether the addition of a slow sand filter in such a system design is a viable solution to provide potable water for the household.

FIGURE 1: SCHEMATIC DRAWING OF RAINWATER HARVESTING SYSTEM

1.3 Objective of Solar Powered Rainwater harvesting System

The research project consists of a detailed literature study on relevant information. From this literature study system diagrams were designed. The necessary design calculations were done to ensure these designs can function. A simulation was performed to test whether water received from rainwater
harvesting can fulfil the requirements of potable water for a rural household. Two different filtration techniques were chosen to test which technique will allow the overall system design to be solar power and automated. Water quality test was done to ensure the filtration technique chosen will meet the SANS 241-20152 standards for human consumption.

2 Solar Powered Rainwater harvesting System: Literature survey

2.1 Introduction

Before any design or experimental procedures can be completed a better understanding of rainwater harvesting is essential. Information about the required design stages will be investigated. Breaking a rainwater harvesting system down into its separate stages will allow a better understanding of what type of components, filtration techniques and pumping will be required at certain stages. All this research will aid in designing a self-powered rainwater harvesting system that will deliver potable water to a small household in a rural area.

2.2 Rainwater Harvesting

Rainwater harvesting is not a new concept, but because municipal water has been plentiful and of good quality, the modern generation has forgotten that many of our forefathers only had rainwater as a source of drinking water. We now have to re-discover the process of harvesting rainwater and apply modern technology and sophistication to supplement the dwindling supply water (Tizagenix, 2017).

Harvesting rainwater is a very simple process and requires minimal effort. Once the fundamental components are installed the weather will take care of the rest. Rainwater is usually captured by any roofed areas i.e. the roof of a house (Tizagenix, 2017). After the rain is collected on the roof it flows through the following process steps:

1. Good primary rainwater filtration
2. Calming inlets
3. Floating suctions
4. Surface skimming overflows in the tanks
5. Post Filtration

In order to design a successful rainwater harvesting system, these process steps need to be followed. Below is a description of the components used in the experimental rainwater harvesting system.

2.2.1 Components used in Rainwater Harvesting Systems

2.2.1.1 Pre-filtration Wisy Filter

The WISY filter, as seen in Figure 2: Schematic drawing of WISY filter operation is a primary filter used in rainwater harvesting systems. It filters away any particles larger than 28 microns. This ensures that only clean filtered water enters the storage tank. Removing large particles will increase the lifespan of the tank and will stop biomatter growth inside the storage tank. The WISY filter operates at 95% efficiency, meaning that only 5% of water passed through the filter is lost through the flush line.

2.2.1.2 Calming inlets Inlet

FIGURE 2: SCHEMATIC DRAWING OF WISY FILTER OPERATION

The WISY filter, as seen in Figure 2: Schematic drawing of WISY filter operation is a primary filter used in rainwater harvesting systems. It filters away any particles larger than 28 microns. This ensures that only clean filtered water enters the storage tank. Removing large particles will increase the lifespan of the tank and will stop biomatter growth inside the storage tank. The WISY filter operates at 95% efficiency, meaning that only 5% of water passed through the filter is lost through the flush line.

2.2.1.2 Calming inlets Inlet

FIGURE 3: SCHEMATIC DRAWING OF CALMING INLET

Fine sediment carried in by the inflowing rainwater settles on the floor of the tank. This layer harbours microbes that provide a natural treatment to the water inside the tank, thus the layer is referred to as the bio-layer. A calming inlet, as seen in Figure 3: Schematic drawing of Calming inlet slows the incoming water and diverts it up away from the bio-layer, thus preventing the inflowing water from disturbing the biolayer. The calming inlet is placed at the bottom of the tank.

2.2.1.3 Floating Suction

FIGURE 4: DESCRIPTION OF A FLOATING SUCTION

The floating suction sits just below the surface of the water and will draw water from the top level of water. Figure 4: Description of a floating suction illustrates how a floating suction is placed inside a tank and the way it looks. The top layer of water is the oldest and cleanest water in the tanks. It has the lowest concentration of entrained particulates and has had the longest ‘treatment’ time with the healthy natural microbes.

2.2.1.4 Skimming Overflows

FIGURE 5: FILTER COMPONENT USED FOR SKIMMING OVERFLOW

Some of the debris and contaminants float to the surface and form a layer of floating debris. Debris such as pollen and oil-based matter form a floating layer on the water surface. This builds up over time and eventually insulates the water from the air. This prevents the transfer of oxygen into the water, reducing the amount of aerobic microbial action that takes place. The overflows are designed so that the floating debris will get discharged out of the tank when the tanks overflow. Figure 5: Filter component used for Skimming overflow shows a typical skimming overflow that will be installed inside water tanks.

2.3 Post Filtration  of Solar Powered Rainwater harvesting System

After the rainwater has been harvested and collected in a storage tank it needs to pass through a post-filtration stage to ensure it is safe for drinking. This experimental study will make use of a slow sand filter for its post-filtration stage. A slow sand filter was selected because it does not require a pump to force the water through the filter, as it is run by gravitational force (SSWM, 2017).

The slow sand filter will be tested and compared to current modern filtration techniques to determine if it is a viable solution to the post-filtration stage of rainwater harvesting.

2.3.1 Slow Sand Filtration

2.3.1.1 History

Slow sand filtration has been an effective water treatment process for preventing the spread of gastrointestinal diseases for over 150 years, having been used first in Great Britain and later in other European countries (American Water Work Association, 1991).

2.3.1.2 Previous uses and designs

Slow sad filters were mostly used to filter water for large settlements prior to the industrial revolution. These filters were designed and built on a large scale and had to filter water for entire towns and cities (American Water Work Association, 1991). India launched a project to design and build slow sand filters on small scale for low-income areas to use them to filter their drinking water. These filters had a number of design flaws. People had to carry water to where the filters were located and could only filter a bucket of water at a time. The filters were often not operated properly because of the lack of understanding, this lead to them running their sand beds dry and not functioning (Bio Sand Filter Organization, 2004). The Indian Slow sand filter can be seen below in Figure 6.

FIGURE 6: BIO SAND FILTERS LAUNCHED IN INDIA (BIO SAND FILTER ORGANIZATION, 2004)

2.3.1.3 Structure

Traditionally a slow sand filter is made up of a filter vessel, namely a concrete box, the sand bed, and the required inlets and outlets for the water to flow. A typical design for a slow sand filter can be viewed in figure 7 below.

FIGURE 7: TYPICAL DESIGN OF A SLOW SAND FILTER (SSWM, 2017)

2.3.1.4 Sand Bed

The design and layout of the sand bed is depicted in Figure 8: Sandbed design below:

FIGURE 8: SAND BED DESIGN (ITACANET, 2005)

2.3.1.5 Process

The basic principle of the process is very simple. Contaminated fresh water flows through a layer of sand, where it not only gets physically filtered but biologically treated. Hereby, both sediments and pathogens are removed. This process is based on the ability of organisms to remove pathogens. The top layers of the sand become biologically active by the establishment of a microbial community on the top layer of the sand substrate, also referred to as schmutzdecke3. These microbes usually come from the source water and establish a community within a matter of a few days. The fine sand and slow filtration rate facilitate the establishment of this microbial community. The majority of the community are predatory bacteria that feed on water-borne microbes passing through the filter (American Water Work Association, 1991).

2.3.1.6 Advantages (SSWM, 2017)

• Very effective removal of bacteria, viruses, protozoa, turbidity and heavy metals in contaminated freshwater
• The simplicity of design and high self-help compatibility: construction, operation and maintenance only require basic skills and knowledge and minimal effort
• If constructed with gravity flow only, no (electrical) pumps required
• Local materials can be used for construction
• High reliability and ability to withstand fluctuations in water quality
• No necessity for the application of chemicals
• Easy to install in rural, semi-urban and remote areas, Simplicity of design and operation
• Long lifespan (estimated >10 years)

2.3.1.7 Disadvantages (SSWM, 2017)

• Minimal quality and constant flow of freshwater required: turbidity (<10-20 NTU) and low algae contamination. Otherwise, pre-treatment may be necessary
• Cold temperatures lower the efficiency of the process due to a decrease in biological activity
• Loss of productivity during the relatively long filter skimming and ripening periods
• Very regular maintenance essential; some basic equipment or ready-made test kits required to monitor some physical and chemical parameters
• The possible need for changes in attitude (the belief that water that flows through a green and slimy filter is safe to drink without the application of chemicals), Chemical compounds (e.g. fluorine) are not removed
• Natural organic matter and other DBPs precursors not removed (maybe formed if chlorine is applied for final disinfection)
• May require electricity
• The requirement of a large land area, large quantities of filter media and manual labour for cleaning, Low filtration rate

2.3.1.8 Effectiveness

Slow sand filters consistently demonstrate their effectiveness in removing suspended particles with effluent turbidities below 1.0 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU), achieving 90% to 99% reductions in bacteria and viruses, and providing virtually complete Giardia lamblia cyst and Cryptosporidium oocyst removal (Tech Brief, 2014). A more detailed look at the effectiveness of the slow sand filter can be viewed in table 1 below:

TABLE 1: TREATMENT PERFORMANCE OF SLOW SAND FILTER (AMERICAN WATER WORK ASSOCIATION, 1991)

2.3.1.9 Important Facts about Slow Sand filter (ITACANET, 2005)

• Sandbed must be kept wet at all times. If the sand bed runs dry the biolayer will die off.
• Flow-through sand bed, which is defined by the hydraulic loading rate (HLR), should be kept as low as possible, preferably between 0.1 – 0.4m/h
• Bio layer takes 3-7 days to become fully active and effectively filter the water
• The top layer of sand bed will become to densely populate over time by biolayer. This will cause the sand layer to get blocked and not allow water to pass through. The top layer of sand then needs to be scraped off and cleaned.

2.3.2 Forced Filtration

2.3.2.1 Definition

In potable systems, the following post-filtration steps are implemented (GERM Africa, 2017):

1. Fines filtration
2. Activated carbon and KDF treatment
3.  Ultra-Violet Sterilization

2.3.2.2 Fines filtration

Various methods are used for removing the fine particulates from the water. We generally filter all particulates larger than 1 micron from the water. In some domestic installations, a back-washable sand filter which removes particulates larger than 80 micron is the first step, then a 20-micron pleated cartridge filter followed by a 1-micron pleated cartridge filter.

2.3.2.3 Activated Carbon and KDF

The activated carbon and KDF unit treat the water for any residual colour and odour that might be present in the water. It also removes chlorides and heavy metals from the water.

2.3.2.4 Ultra-Violet Sterilization

The UV sterilizer kills 99.9% of all microbes that might still be present in the water.

The above steps are scalable and can be applied to large industrial scale installations as well as small domestic systems.

Forced Filtration consists of a multistage filtration process to ensure the best quality of potable water. A typical layout of such a system can be view in Figure 9: Schematic depicting a forced filtration setup. The forced filtration setup comes at a large additional cost and power usage. A large external pump is required to deliver the required pressure for the filters to work and the UV light requires additional electricity. The filters and UV lightbulb have a set lifetime and need to be replaced at the end of each lifetime. This escalated the cost of such a system dramatically (GERM Africa, 2017).

FIGURE 9: SCHEMATIC DEPICTING A FORCED FILTRATION SETUP

2.4 Water Usage

The typical household (2 adults and three children) in South African uses about 250 litres of water a day. That amounts to 7500 litres a month which is already more than the monthly free water allowance every household receives from the municipality. The typical South African household consisting of 3 children and two parents would then use on average 37500 litres of water a month (Aquarista, 2017)

FIGURE 10: AVERAGE FAMILY WATER CONSUMPTION

The average water consumption can then be broken up into various fields depending on what the water is used for. For the purpose of this research, project interest is only shown to where potable water is needed i.e. bathroom and kitchen uses as shown in Figure 10: Average Family water Consumption.

2.5 Solar Power

For the system to be fully automated and provide potable water for the household inside the house an element of pumping will be required. This pump will require a power source and due to the lack of electrical infrastructure in rural areas, it has been deciding to make the system solar powered.

2.5.1 Factors influencing Solar Power

There is no such thing as a perfect technology. Research reveals the different factors that can affect the efficiency of solar panel mounting systems. Some of these factors have been studied to either increase or decrease the power production from the three types of mountings such as sun intensity, cloud cover, relative humidity, and heat buildup. When the sun is in its peak (intense), during midday, the most solar energy is collected; therefore, there is an increase in the power output. Cloudy days contribute to the decrease in sunlight collection effectiveness since clouds reflect some of the sun’s rays and limit the amount of sun absorption by the panels. During summer days when the temperature is at its highest and heat is built up quickly, the solar power output is reduced by 10% to 25% for the reason that too much heat increases the conductivity of semiconductor making the charges balance and reducing the magnitude of the electric field. In addition, if humidity penetrates into the solar panel frame, this can reduce the panel’s performance producing less amount of power and worse can permanently deteriorate the performance of the modules (Gordo, Khalaf, & Strangeowl, 2015).

2.5.2 Solar Powered Rainwater harvesting System: Effective Solar Energy Available

Below in figure 10 is a solar map of South Africa depicting the available solar energy in the different areas over the country.

FIGURE 11: SOLAR MAP OF SOUTH AFRICA (SOLAR SCENE, 2016)

Figure 11: Solar map of South Africa indicates that coastal areas have less available solar energy than inland areas. The coastal areas do offer enough to power a small scale system that does not require a lot of power and does not require solar energy every day. Therefore in the design of a solar system close to the coast, a battery will be required.

2.5.3 Solar Charge Controllers for Solar Powered Rainwater harvesting System

A charge controller or charge regulator is basically a voltage and/or current regulator to keep batteries from overcharging. It regulates the voltage and current coming from the solar panels going to the battery. Most “12 volts” panels put out about 16 to 20 volts, so if there is no regulation the batteries will be damaged from overcharging. Most batteries need around 14 to 14.5 volts to get fully charged (Wind & Sun, 2017)

2.6 Conclusion

From the literature about rainwater harvesting, it is clear that in order to harvest and use rainwater the appropriate steps has been taken. Ensuring all primary processes are in place made the system more efficient and reliable.

Post filtration is essential for this system design and the experimental test to follow will prove if the literature about the slow sand filter can be applied in a system design such as this one.

The information discussed above will be used to implement a functioning solar power rainwater harvesting system that will deliver potable water to a rural household via a slow sand filter.

3 Solar Powered Rainwater harvesting System: Flow diagrams

A rainwater harvesting system was designed following the correct process steps as stated in the literature1 review. In order to design the system such that it can be fully automated and solar power it was decided to use a slow sand filter in the post-filtration stage. A second system was designed using a more
conventional filtration technique, forced fines filtration, to see how the slow sand filtration technique would measure up to conventional techniques.

Both systems were designed with the same rainwater harvesting processes. The only difference is the postfiltration techniques.

Flow diagrams were drawn up using AUTO CAD. This was done to get a clear idea of how the experimental setup would be constructed.

3.1 Flow Diagram for Slow Sand Filtration Setup

FIGURE 12: CONCEPTUAL FLOW DIAGRAM OF SSF SYSTEM

• Stage 1: Rain will be harvested from the 35sqm roof area. The water will flow down the installed gutter systems and pass through the Wisy 110mm inline filter. The discharge of this filter will enter the 1000l storage tank via a calming inlet as per design requirements. The flush line of the Wisy
  the filter will run out onto the concrete surface area and down the stormwater lines.
• Stage 2: The Rainwater will be stored in a 1000l Rotor tank. The water tank will be fitted with a calming inlet and skimming overflow as per design requirements. The tank will be installed on a height above the slow sand filter. This will allow the water to flow to the slow sand filter using gravity.

FIGURE 13: ZOOMED IMAGE OF SLOW SAND FILTER FLOW DIAGRAM

• Stage 3: The rainwater will enter the top of the slow sand filter via a calming inlet as not to disturb the top layer of the Schmutzdecke. The flow of the rainwater will be regulated by an orifice installed at the entry point to the slow sand filter. This will ensure that the flow rate through the
  filter does not exceed the recommended 0.4m/h. The slow sand filter will be designed with the appropriate drain and overflow valves, it will also include an outlet system to allow water at the bottom of the filter to be captured. The filter media in the slow sand filter will consist of a layer of coarse clean gravel. The gravel will support the sand layers above it. The sand layers will consist of a coarse layer of filter sand which will support the finer river sand above it.
• Stage 4: This stage consists of the ground-level storage tank. The filtered water will flow into the storage tank via a “gooseneck” plumbing feature as seen in figure 18. This configuration will allow water to flow into the storage tank but will not allow the sand bed to ever run dry. Running the sand bed dry will result in killing the Schmutzdecke.
• Stage 5: The solar panel will be installed on the roof of the building in an area where there is no shade and will face north to gather the most of the sunlight in a day. The charge from the solar panel will run to a solar charger that will keep the 12V battery charged at all times. The 12V battery
  will supply power to the solar pump.
• Stage 6: The solar pump will be used to pump the water up to a top-level storage tank. The pump uses a small amount of power but also delivers a low flow rate. An electronic float switch will be installed in the ground-level storage tank to ensure the pump does not run dry.
• Stage 7: The solar pump will pump the water to a top-level storage tank (roof height). The top-level tank will ensure enough pressure for the user inside the house via gravity when water is needed. This also allows for the use of a small solar pump that uses less power and delivers a smaller flowrate. A float valve will be installed in the top-level storage tank that will switch off the pump when the storage tank is filled.
• Stage 8: The user inside the house will be able to open a specific tap for the use of potable drinking water. This tap will be used each day to simulate a households daily potable water consumption needs.

FIGURE 14: 3D VIEW OF EXPERIMENTAL LAYOUT

Figure 13 depicts a three-dimensional view of the layout for the proposed system. As seen from the figure the 1000l storage tank is a height above the slow sand filter drum. This is due to the layout of the chosen location where the experimental procedure is to take place. This height difference is enough to allow the outlet from the storage tank to be at the same height as the inlet to the slow sand filter. Therefore there is no need to construct a stand for the storage tank to be placed on.

3.2 Flow Diagram for Forced Filtration Setup

FIGURE 15: CONCEPTUAL FLOW DIAGRAM OF FORCED FILTRATION SYSTEM

• Stage 1: Rain will be harvested from the 35sqm roof area. The water will flow down the installed gutter systems and pass through the Wisy 110mm inline filter. The discharge of this filter will enter the 1000l storage tank at via a calming inlet as per design requirements. The flush line of the Wisy
  the filter will run out onto the concrete surface area and down the stormwater lines.
• Stage 2: The Rainwater will be stored in a 1000l Rotor tank. The water tank will be fitted with a calming inlet and skimming overflow as per design requirements.
• Stage 3: Power for the system will be supplied by the 40W solar panel. The panel will be installed on the roof of the building in an area that is not shaded at any point in the day. The panel will be installed such that it faces north to get the best exposure to the sun. The solar panel will provide
  charge to the solar charger. This will keep the battery pack charged at all times. The 12V DC current will then be converted into 220V AC current by an inverter. The power supply will be run to the UV light and the submersible pump.
• Stage 4: A submersible pump will pump the stored rainwater out of the tank and through the filtration set into the household. The submersible pump will be fitted with a pressure pump controller that allows it to turn on as soon as the tap is opened inside the house. The pump will
  also, have a float switch to protect it from running dry.

FIGURE 16: ZOOMED IMAGE OF FILTRATION UNIT FOR FORCED FILTRATION

• Stage 5: The submersible pump will pump the rainwater through the filtration set. The filtration set consists of a 20-micron filter then a 5-micron filter. After the fines filtration stage, the water will pass through an active carbon KDF filter. From here the remaining bacteria in the water will be
  removed by passing the water over an ultra-violet filter.
• Stage 6: The water will run straight from the filtration set into the household. The water can be accessed by opening the required tap for potable water.

3.3 System flow diagrams discussion

The information about the two different system diagrams indicates that the slow sand filter design will be better suited for the application in a rural settlement environment. Due to its low energy requirements, low cost, easy maintenance and simplicity the slow sand filter design will be a preferable system design to be used. In order to establish if the slow sand filter system design is effective, it will have to be tested against the conventional forced filtration method. Therefore both systems will be manufactured and tested.

4 Solar Powered Rainwater harvesting System: Viability of RWH system for Rural Household Potable Water Supply

To establish if harvesting rainwater can supply enough water to satisfy a rural household’s potable water needs a test needed to be performed. Rainfall is dependent on weather patterns and is always changing. In order to perform this test and to take into account the ever-changing rain patterns, a Matlab Simulink model was created.

The Simulink model will use daily rainfall data from the last ten years in the Amanzimtoti area. This dataset provides a large enough data population to determine accurate mean values for daily rainfall. The dataset takes into account outliers, I.e.freak storms or droughts, but will not take into account the global wether change over the last century. The dataset was gathered by a national weather station located in Amanzimtoti (SA Weather service, 2017).

The Simulink model will create a forecast of the daily rainfall, over a time period of a year, in the Amanzimtoti area. The forecast model can be viewed below in Figure 17: Forecast model for daily rainfall. The block diagram design of the Simulink model can be viewed in Appendix G

FIGURE 17: FORECAST MODEL FOR DAILY RAINFALL

Another valuable piece of information needed to complete the test is the average daily potable water consumption that will take place. From the literature review, it is clear that a family of 5 uses approximately 250L of water per day (Aquarista, 2017). This equates to 50L per person. Using Figure 10: Average Family water Consumption, the amount of potable water usage was calculated using only the water used in the bathroom and the kitchen, as the other water uses do not require the water to be of potable standards:

It should be noted that adding up all the rain throughout the year and dividing it by the amount of water usage will not give an accurate result as there are a number of variables that need to be accounted for. These variables include the roof area that will be used for harvesting rainwater, the efficiency of the prefiltration method, the storage tank volume and the tank over-flow periods. The Simulink model allows inserting the values of the roof area, storage tank volume and the daily water consumption. It uses the calculated forecast model with these variables to run the simulation. The results from the simulation show the tank level throughout the year. It also indicates the overall system efficiency, total water harvested and the total amount of water lost.

For the purpose of running an experimental procedure, a small roofed building had to be selected for the location of the experiment. A backroom in the yard of Manna Hoogenboezem was selected as the chosen experimental building. It yielded the same environment as represented by rural area households with a roof area of 35sqm and corrugated iron roof sheeting. The building lies in an area of densely populated trees and plant growth. Animal life-like birds and monkeys are also present. It has one bedroom a small kitchen and a bathroom, ideally suited for one person to live there. Therefore the chosen building is a correct representation of the intended rural household.

The following information was used to simulate the experimental procedure:

• Tank Volume 1000l
• Roof area 35sqm
• Daily water consumption of 20l (including safety factor of 1.3)
• Pre-filtration efficiency of 95%

The simulation used the information above and the forecasted rainfall model to predict the tank level throughout the year. The result can be viewed in figure 18:

FIGURE 18: TANK LEVEL THROUGHOUT THE YEAR

Figure 18 above shows that harvesting rainwater can provide enough water to supply the potable water needs throughout most of the year. It is clear that in the winter months with less rainfall there will be a shortage in supply. If wise water management is implemented throughout these months the supply will be sufficient.

In order to verify that the simulation is correct, actual rainfall data were recorded throughout the experimental timeframe (19th February 2017 – 11th May 2017). This data set could then graphically be represented against the predicted rainfall data for the same time period. Figure 19 below shows the resultant comparison:

FIGURE 19: PREDICTED RAINFALL VS ACTUAL RAINFALL COMPARISON

Figure 19: Predicted rainfall vs actual rainfall comparison shows that the actual rainfall in the experimental time frame follows the same pattern as the predicted rainfall. Figure 19 proves that the simulation model used is accurate and correct. From the predictions made by the simulation, it can be stated that harvesting rainwater will supply a sufficient amount of water to satisfy the potable water needs of a rural household.

5 Solar Powered Rainwater harvesting System: Design Calculations

Before the systems in section 3 could be built, a number of design calculations had to be completed to ensure the systems will perform as required.

5.1 Slow Sand filter Setup Calculations

5.1.1 Flow Rate through Sand Filter

As discussed in the literature review section 4.2.7, for the Schumtzdecke to be effective the water passing through the sand filter needs to flow at a constant slow flow rate. Therefore a hydraulic loading rate of 0.4m/h was chosen to design the sand filter. By using equation [1] the required flow rate into the sand filter can be calculated.

[1]

5.1.2 Orifice Calculations for Slow Sand Filter Design

Part of the automation process of the system design is to place the storage tank of the harvested rainwater at a height above the slow sand filter. This will allow the water to be fed into the slow sand filter via gravity. As seen in the literature study done on slow sand filters, for the filter to work effectively the flow through the filter needs to be controlled. To keep the flow restricted below 19.63l/h, as calculated in section 4.1, it was decided to design and install an orifice. The operation of an orifice is depicted in figure 20 below.

FIGURE 20: SCHEMATIC DRAWING OF AN ORIFICE DESIGN

The flow rate through an orifice plate can be determined by the use of equation [2] as stated below (White, 2011):

[2]

Using the properties and dimensions listed in table 2 below the required pressure drop across the orifice plate could be determined:

TABLE 2: PROPERTIES TO CALCULATE ORIFICE DIMENSIONS

The static pressure before the orifice is calculated using equation [3] derived from Bernoulli’s equation:

[3]

The pressure after the orifice plate is calculated using the required flow rate into the slow sand filter and with equation [4]:

[4]

The discharge coefficient is dependent on the Reynolds number of the flow through the orifice plate. The Reynolds number is determined using equation [5] and [6] as seen below:

[5]

[6]

FIGURE 21: DISCHARGE COEFFICIENT FOR THIN PLATE ORIFICE WITH D: 1/2D TAPS (EMERSON ELECTRIC CO, 2017)

The results from [6] were used together with Figure 21: Discharge Coefficient for thin plate orifice with D: 1/2D taps to determine the discharge coefficient for different diameter orifice plates. The discharge coefficients ranged from 0.605 to 0.62 as the size of the orifice increased.

These values together with the known required flow rate were used in an excel spreadsheet to determine the required orifice plate diameter.

The excel spreadsheet proved that the required orifice plate diameter is 3mm. Therefore a 3mm diameter orifice was installed in the experimental setup.

Using the calculated 3mm diameter orifice and equation [2] a new spread was set up to determine the flowrate into the slow sand filter at the different levels of the storage tank. This was done to ensure the flow rate never exceeds the recommended rate of 19l/h and to determine the lowest flow rate that will flow into the slow sand filter. The resultant data can be viewed in figure 22.

FIGURE 22: FLOW RATE THROUGH ORIFICE AT DIFFERENT TANK LEVELS

An experimental test was run to verify the calculations above. Water was allowed to flow from the tank through the installed orifice and into a 20l bucket for an hour at a time. This procedure was followed for three different tank levels. The water that was in the bucket after the test was measure and recorded. The data can be viewed in figure 23 below:

FIGURE 23: EXPERIMENTAL DATA FOR FLOW THROUGH ORIFICE PLATE

As seen in figure 22, the calculated flow rate never exceeds the recommended 19.63l/h. This information is verified by the experimental data in figure 23 showing that the experimental flow rate follows the same curve as the calculated flow, and it does not exceed the recommended value either. Figure 24 shows the chosen orifice plate to be installed.

FIGURE 24: CHOSEN ORIFICE, DIAMETER OF 3MM

5.1.3 Pump Selection for Solar Powered Rainwater harvesting System

The aim of the system design is to make the system as automated as possible, but a pumping system will be required to supply water to the household.
For the SSF system layout, the goal is to use as little electrical energy as possible. However, potable drinking water still needs to be delivered to the household at pressure. To accomplish this and use less energy the proposed layout makes use of a small pump that pumps the water at a low flow rate to a storage tank at roof height of the house. The water is then supplied to the household making use of gravity to supply the pressure.

TABLE 3: PROPERTIES FOR PUMP SELECTION

To solve for the system requirements Bernoulli’s equation is used as seen in equation [7] below:

[7]

Where hp is the head increase across the pump. But since P1=P2 and V1=V2=0, solve for the pump head:

[8]

There is no specified flow rate for the system design but in order to save power, the flow rate should be specified as low as possible and still be able to pump the max daily water consumption per day. Therefore the max required flow rate will be 200l/day.

[9]

Now list and sum the minor loss coefficients:

TABLE 4: MINOR LOSS COEFFICIENTS FOR PIPE FITTINGS (WHITE, 2011) (ENGINEERING TOOLBOX, 2017)

Calculate Reynolds numbed and pipe friction factor using equation [6]:

Therefore the flow in the pipe is the laminar flow:

[10]

Using the calculations above a system requirement curve was calculated for different flow rates.

FIGURE 25: SYSTEM REQUIREMENT CURVE

FIGURE 26: PUMP CURVE (FLOWJET, 2017)

Figure 25: System Requirement curve is the system requirement curve that the pump must satisfy in order for the design to function. Figure 26: Pump curve shows the pump curve for the 12V solar pump Xc Trading Model XC-SP-002-12C. It is indicated by figure 26 that the chosen pump will deliver the required head at the required flow rate as the supply points are above the required points. Therefore the chosen pump will
function in this design.

In order to pump the water at the required rate and height the pump must displace power to the water of:

[11]

This is the theoretical power requirement from the pump. Experimental readings of the pressure and flow rate were taken, view table 5 for results. This data can then be used to calculate the actual power requirement of the pump.

TABLE 5: EXPERIMENTAL DATA COLLECTED

Therefore the actual power requirement from the pump is calculated to be:

[12]

5.1.4 Power supply calculations for Solar Powered Rainwater harvesting System

The pump is the only component that requires electrical energy to operate. The power to the pump will be supplied by a 12V battery that will be kept charged by a solar panel. Calculations were done to verify how effective the chosen components would power the system.

5.1.4.1 Components specification

The chosen components include a solar pump, a 12V battery and a 40W solar panel. These components were selected as they were available for use to complete the experimental procedure, and did not have to be purchased. The specifications of these components can be found in table 6 below. The specifications were listed on the components as designed by the manufacturing companies.

TABLE 6: COMPONENT SPECIFICATIONS

The pump will run for three 5minute cycles per day to satisfy the required 20l per day water usage. This adds up to 0.25hours run time.

[13]

With the installed solar charge controller the battery will only be allowed to drain 50% of its capacity.

[14]

7 days run time is enough to keep the pump running throughout cloudy and rainy days when there is no solar charge available. When the sun does come out the battery can be charged in:

[15]

Taking into account the losses in the solar panel and the sun factors, the resultant time required to charge the battery is to be taken as 5 hours. As there is only 6 hours of effective sunlight in an average day, it is safe to assume the system will only require one sunny day to recharge and be ready for the next 7 days.

5.1.5 Head loss through Sand Bed

As discussed in the literature the slow sand filtration process depends on the biolayer that grows on the top layer of the sand bed. Over time this layer will become to densely populate and will block the flow of water through the filter. At this point, the user will have to scrape off the top layer of sand and wash it (American Water Work Association, 1991).

In order for the user to know when to clean the sand, layer piezometers have been installed in the experimental setup. These piezometers will indicate the head loss across the sand bed. The maximum allowable head loss can be calculated using Darcy’s law as seen in equation [16] below:

[16]

FIGURE 27: HEAD LOSS THROUGH POROUS MEDIUM

Figure 27: Head loss through porous medium indicates how equation [16] was implemented on the experimental setup.

5.1.5.1 The Hydraulic Conductivity, K, for different sands and gravels are depicted in Table 5 below:

TABLE 7: HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF DIFFERENT MATERIALS (STRUCTX, 2017)

The hydraulic conductivity, K, is a constant for a given porous medium. A very porous medium with little resistance to flow will have a high value for K, while a tightly packed medium with high resistance to flow will have a low value for K.

The slow sand filter is specified to operate at a hydraulic loading rate of 0.1 – 0.4 m/h. Therefore if the HLR is below 0.1m/h, the sand bed can be declared blocked and needs cleaning.

Therefore using equation 12, figure 4, and table 5 the maximum allowable head loss through the sand bed can be calculated as follows.

Therefore it can be stated as the Schmutzdecke becomes more populated the top layer of sand becomes more blocked. This will decrease the hydraulic conductivity of the sand. If the same flow rate is required through the filter the head-loss across the filter bed will increase. This head-loss can be viewed on the piezometers installed on the sand filter. The head-loss required for the user to know when to clean the sand bed will differ from system to system as the sand will vary. An installed system should be monitored and checked regularly, for when the flow rate out the sand filter reached as low as 4.91e-03m3/s, the filter bed needs to be cleaned. At this point, a mark can be made on the piezometers so that in future the piezometers can just be monitored for that particular sand filter.

5.2 Forced Filtration Setup Calculations

For the forced filtration system set up a filtration skid was provided to complete the experimental procedure. Forced fines filtration systems are common in households around the world. These filtration systems all operate under the same principle as described in the literature study.

FIGURE 28: SYSTEM REQUIREMENT CURVE

5.2.1 System Requirement Curve

The pressure drop across the filtration system was measured by reading the pressure at the pump outlet and the pressure after the entire filtration skid. As the filtration skid is located at the point of water usage, the frictional energy loss was assumed to be minimal. The pressure drop across the filtration system can therefore be assumed to be the system requirement curve, that can be view in figure 28.

It should be noted as the filters become dirty over time, they increase the resistance of the filtration system. Therefore it is important that the chosen pump can deliver the required flow rate through the dirty filters.

FIGURE 29: PUMP SUPPLY CURVE (SHIMGE, 2017

The chosen pump for Tizagenix small scale filtration skids is a Shimge QT Peripheral Pump .37kW. the pump curve for the chosen pump can be viewed in figure 29 on the QT37 line. Figure 29 indicates that at a flow rate of 50l/min the .37kW pump will provide enough head to supply the filtration skid even with dirty filters.

5.2.2 Power supply

In order to pump the water at the required rate and height the pump must displace power to the water of:

[11]

The pump is not the only component that requires electrical energy to function. An 11W UV light bulb also needs to be provided with power.

That leaves the total energy requirement of the system to be 112.98W

The system will run for three 10 second cycles per day to satisfy the required 20l per day water usage. This adds up to 0.00833hours run time.

[13]

With the installed solar charge controller the battery will only be allowed to drain 50% of its capacity.

[14]

2 days run time is not enough to keep the pump running throughout cloudy and rainy days when there is no solar charge available. A bigger battery system will be needed to keep the system operating for a longer period of time without charge.

Due to the short power supply time and the fact that the pump and UV light requires 220V AC current, it was decided to plug the system into the households power supply for the sake of the experiment. This was done to avoid buying additional batteries and invertors.

The design calculations have proven that the forced filtration can be solar-powered, but requires a 100 times more energy than the slow sand filtration setup.

6 Solar Powered Rainwater harvesting System: Experimental Procedure Components

After the designs of each system were verified with the necessary calculations, the experimental setup of each design could be assembled.

6.1 Building procedure for SSF design

• All water storage tanks were cleaned and sterilized. The tanks used for the experimental procedure can be viewed below in figure 30. According to the design drawings, holes were drilled in the correct locations for the tank fittings to be installed.

FIGURE 30: WATER STORAGE TANKS BEING PREPPED

• The correct guttering system was installed on the roof of the chosen building. The gutter network was then connected to a Wisy 110 inline filter. The discharge of the Wisy filter was routed to the 1000l storage tank. The flush line of the Wisy was routed down to the concrete floor where the water will run into the stormwater drains. Photos of the gutter network and the connection to the Wizy inline filter can be viewed below in figure 31.

FIGURE 31: GUTTER NETWORK WITH WISY FILTER CONNECTION

• Figure 32 shows the correct fittings and drains were installed as per design drawings

FIGURE 32: TANK FITTINGS INSTALLED

• Calming inlets and Drainages were manufactured and installed as per figure 33 below.

FIGURE 33: CALMING INLETS AND DRAINAGES

• The Sand filter was filled to the correct levels with the correct sand as per design requirements. The first layer contained coarse gravel (38mm). The coarse gravel is there to support the sand bed so that it does not drain away with the water. The gravel was washed before inserted into the filter. A layer of filter sand was then added (38mm). This type of sand is predominantly used in rapid-rate sand filters and is a course in quality. The final and thickest layer of river sand was then added to the filter (450mm). (ITACANET, 2005). Figure 34 shows photos of the sand and gravel that was used in the slow sand filter.

FIGURE 34: GRAVEL AND SAND USED IN SSF

• All systems were then interconnected using various valves and piping as shown in figure 35.

FIGURE 35: INTERCONNECTION OF SYSTEMS

• The chosen orifice plate was installed at the inlet of the slow sand filter. Afloat valve (figure 36) was installed inside the slow sand filter to ensure the filter does not overflow.

FIGURE 36: FLOAT VALVE

• Afloat switch (figure 37) was placed in the second storage tank and connected to the power source to the pump. This will ensure the pump does not run dry when the tank is empty.

FIGURE 37: FLOAT SWITCH

• A float valve was installed in the top tank to ensure the tank does not overflow and wastewater. When the float valve shuts off the cut-off pressure of the solar pump will be exceeded and the pump will shut off. This will save electricity and ensure that the pump only activates when water is being used.
• The 40W solar panel was installed on the roof of the building. It was wired up and connected to the solar charge controller. This will ensure that the 12V battery is not overcharged or drained below 50% of its capacity.
• The battery and the pump are connected to the solar charge controller.

After the building procedure was completed rainwater was allowed to run into the sand filter and fill the sand bed. All valves were closed and the water was allowed to stay in the filter for 4 days. This was done to give the bio-layer a chance to grow. After this initiation period, the system was allowed to run. 20l of water was drained from the top storage tank every day to simulate the daily water consumption. Section 7.2 will highlight the procedure followed to take water samples every week to test the water quality of the system.

Through the run time of the system, a number of errors were noticed and had to be addressed.

6.1.1.1 Rectifications and adjustments

After the first two weeks of run time for the system, it was noted that the system is filtering the rainwater and the bacteria count is decreasing. Upon the 3rd week’s water sample result it showed the water after the filtration process contained more bacteria than the pre-filtered water. Inspection of the system revealed that leaves and other bio-matter had managed to enter the storage tanks via the openings and doors. The system was drained and cleaned. The slow sand filter was isolated as not to disrupt the Schumtzdecke. After the system was reset the storage tanks were sealed off with plastic bags to ensure no bio-matter could entre again and influence the water quality. The system was allowed to run again.

After the water sample was taken on the 17th of March the water quality started to worsen again. A good look at the experimental setup was done and a number of errors were found that needed to be addressed. These errors included blocked gutters and incorrect sand sizes.

The area in which the experimental setup is located is surrounded by a dense population of trees as to simulated real-life circumstances. These trees cause the gutters to get filled to the brim with leaves. As these leaves blocked the gutters they were lying in stagnant water. Therefore the leaves were cause less water to enter the system when it rained but also caused rotten water to enter the tank and contaminate the rest of the stored water.

FIGURE 38: BLOCKED GUTTERS

The gutters in figure 38 were cleaned and the system was cleaned out and reset as to get rid of the contaminated water.

After analyzing the experimental setup for possible flaws it was noted that the sand in the top layer of the sand bed did not conform to the standards made clear in the literature. Therefore the slow sand filter was operating and filtering the water but not effectively enough as the top layer of sand particles were bigger than specified and did not allow the Schmutzdecke to properly form.

FIGURE 39: WASHING AND SORTING OF INCORRECT SAND SIZES

The sand bed was taken out of the filter drum and washed as seen in figure 39 above. Plaster sand was considered to be a replacement top sand as it is much finer in particle size than river sand. Plaster sand contains high amounts of clay and was not able to get clean enough to work inside the slow sand filter.

The fine beach sand was then selected for the replacement in the filter box. The sand was properly washed and entered at the correct depths and specification. The filter was filled with rainwater and left for 4 days for the Schmutzdecke to be re-established. The system was run as usual after the initiation period was over. Water samples were taken once a week and proved that the corrections made the difference as the samples returned a zero bacteria count for the filtered water.

6.2 Building Procedure of Forced Filtration Design

• The forced filtration setup will make use of the same roofed structure, gutter network, prefiltration and storage tank as the SSF setup
• As per design water will be pump out of the storage tank using the Shimge QT peripheral pump. Figure 40 depicts what the pump looks like. The power for the pump will come from a 220V wall socket as the pump requires alternation current and as calculated will drain the solar power supply to quickly to function.

FIGURE 40: QT PERIPHERAL PUMP

• A float switch will be connected to the power source of the pump. This will allow the pump to switch off when the water level in the storage tank is too low. The float switch can be viewed in figure 41 . The pump comes installed with its own pump controller. This means the pump starts up when the tap is opened inside the house and water is required.

FIGURE 41: SUBMERSIBLE PUMP WORKING WITH FLOAT SWITCH

• The filtration was pre-ordered and manufactured. The pump was connected to the filtration unit inlet. The outlet was connected to the plumbing of the small building, allowing the tap inside to make use of the filtered rainwater. The installed filtration set can be viewed in figure 42 below.

FIGURE 42: INSTALLED FORCED FILTRATION SET

Once the forced filtration system was installed it was tested. All components functioned according to the design. A water sample was taken of the post filtered water and the micro-slide proved that there were no bacteria present in the water after the filtration. Thus no further adjustments needed to be made to the system layout.

7 Solar Powered Rainwater harvesting System: Data Recordings

7.1 Rainfall

Section 4 of the report proves that rainwater harvesting can provide enough water to satisfy the potable water needs of a small household. A simulation was performed in order to prove this fact, and it was verified by recording the actual rainfall over the experimental time frame from 19th February 2017 – 11th May 2017. The recorded actual rainfall can be viewed in section 4 under Figure 19: Predicted rainfall vs actual rainfall comparison.

Rainfall was measured by a rain gauge that was located on the same property as the experimental setup. The rain gauge was not obstructed by any trees or buildings to ensure accurate data was recorded. The rain gauge was emptied every day and reading was recorded. The rain gauge can be viewed below in
figure 44.

FIGURE 43: RAIN GUAGE

7.2 Water Samples for Slow Sand Filter Setup

Part of the objective of this research study was to determine if a slow sand filter can purify rainwater to potable standards. In order to test whether this is possible water samples were taken. To send a water sample off to a lab and get it analyzed is very expensive and takes time. Therefor basic water quality test was performed using Mikrocount Combi test slides as seen in figure 45, while the experimental setup was fine-tuned

FIGURE 44: MIKROCOUNT COMBI TEST KIT

The quality test was taken once every week for the duration of the experimental time period. These samples are taken by dipping the test slide into the water and then placing it back in the incubation chamber. The slides must be left to incubate for 48 hours. After 48 hours the slide is removed and data is read off the bacterial scale provided in the test kit as seen in figure 47. The one side of the slide will show the bacterial count present in the water and the other side will show the yeast and fungi count, as seen in figure 46.

FIGURE 45: BACTERIAL COUNT, YEAST AND FUNGI COUNT

FIGURE 46: INFORMATION TABLE TO CALCULATE BACTERIAL, YEAST & FUNGI COUNT

Samples will be taken from 3 different locations each time.

• Location 1 (figure 48): This water sample is the water in the 1000l storage tank (pre-filtration). This is to determine how much bacterial is present in the rainwater that is harvested off the roof

FIGURE 47: LOCATION 1 WATER SAMPLE

• Location 2 (figure 49): This water sample is the water in the second small storage tank on ground level (post-filtration). This is to determine how much bacteria is left in the water after passing through the filter.
• Location 3 (figure 49): This water sample is the water stored at the top of the roof (post-filtration, after some time). This is to determine if the fresh filtered water will stay clean after being stored for a number of days, this will also show if there is any bacterial regrowth.

FIGURE 48: LOCATION 2&3 WATER SAMPLES

7.2.1 Data Recordings

TABLE 8: BACTERIAL COUNT DATA COLLECTION

As seen from table 9 the water in the 1000l storage tank contains a high number of bacteria and is therefore not suitable for drinking water. As discussed in section 6.1.1 there were a number of errors during the experimental period that influenced the water quality. Table 9 shows evidence when these
errors were influencing the water quality.

• 2/24/2017 – 3/10/2017: The system was still initializing the bio-layer of the sand filter and biomaterial was found in the storage tanks
• 3/17/2017 – 3/24/2017: System was operating, but not as efficiently as required as there was still bacteria present in the water
• 3/24/2017 – 4/14/2017: Errors in the system caused water quality to worsen. Leaves in gutters cause rotten water in the main storage tank. Incorrect sand sizes cause sand filter not to function as designed.
• 4/14/2017: System was reset and errors were addressed. Initialization period was allowed. No samples were taken
• 4/28/2017: Post filtration showed zero bacteria count

Yeast and Fungi were never found present in the water in any of the samples taken. The data set was used to determine when the SSF was functioning as per design.

The N/A notation is used to indicate no water sample test was taken at this location. This was due to the system being reset, or still in the initialization phase. Sample test was not performed when there was no water in the storage tanks to test.

FIGURE 49: BACTERIAL COUNT AT LOCATION 1 ON 17/03/2017

FIGURE 50: BACTERIAL COUNT AT LOCATION 2 ON 17/03/2017

Figure 50 and figure 51 indicates what the Micro count Combi slides looked like after they were inserted in two water samples and left to incubate for 48hours.

7.3 Water Sample Analysis from Umgeni Water

After the Slow sand filter setup showed results of zero bacteria count a water sample was taken to be analyzed according to the SANS 241 standards. A water sample was taken from the forced filtration setup to be analyzed in the same manner. The results of this analysis will be used to compare the two filtration systems. The samples were sent off to Umgeni Water in Pinetown for analysis. Please find Umgeni Water certification of accreditation from SANS in Appendix K.

7.3.1 Results from Water Samples

Umgeni Water ran a test on three different water samples. A sample from the pre-filtered water, post-filtered water by SSF and a sample of the post-filtered water from forced filtration. The results can be viewed below.

TABLE 9: RESULTS FROM WATER ANALYSIS

The results listed in table 9 needs to be compared to the SANS 241-2015 standards to ensure the water is safe for human consumption. The SANS standards limitations can be viewed in table 10 below.

TABLE 10: SANS STANDARDS LIMITATIONS

• Chronic Health: A chronic condition is a human health condition or disease that is persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects or a disease that comes with time. The term chronic is often applied when the course of the disease lasts for more than three months. Therefore how the water
  will affect the long term health of a user.
• Acute Health: Acute care is a branch of secondary health care where a patient receives active but short-term treatment for a severe injury or episode of illness, an urgent medical condition, or during recovery from surgery. In medical terms, care for acute health conditions is the opposite of chronic care or longer-term care. The effects the water will have on the short term health of a user
• Operational: This factor entails the operational capability of the water. Whether it can be used in daily operations i.e. cooking and cleaning.
• Aesthetic: The way the water looks to the human eye. Is it clear and clean or mercy and muddy.

A comparison is drawn up between the SSF and forced filtration set up by comparing the effective removal capability of each system. The results from each system are then compared to the SANS limitations to ensure the water is of potable standards.

TABLE 11: ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLE RESULTS

7.3.2 Discussion of Results

From the results obtained in table 9 and table 10, it is clear that the slow sand filter does not filter water effectively enough to produce potable water according to the SANS 241-2015 standards. The slow sand filter does not perform as well as the forced filtration in filtering the rainwater.

These results prove that a slow sand filter cannot be used to filter the rainwater in a rainwater harvesting system. If a slow sand filter is to be used, it must be done while incorporating filtering techniques used by the forced filtration setup. The forced filtration setup has proven to filter the water to the correct
standards.

8 Solar Powered Rainwater harvesting System: Conclusion & Recommendations

Throughout the research and experimental study, it was proven that a rainwater harvesting system can be designed to be solar-powered and to provide enough water to satisfy the potable water needs of a small household. The study however did prove that the use of a slow sand filter in such design is not sufficient, as it does not meet the SANS 241-2015 standards.

The literature on the slow sand filter showed that it would be an ideally suited filtering technique for such a system, due to its low cost, low maintenance and simplicity. Literature and research on slow sand filters were done in the early 19th century and some of the research is outdated to a certain extent. Water quality test has become more sophisticated and detailed as what they were when slow sand filters were still being used on large scale.

In order to get the system to operate as designed, the slow sand filter will have to work together with some aspects of the forced filtration technique. A layer of activated carbon can be inserted into the slow sand filter. The solar pump can pump the water through a UV sterilization system. Making these corrections will improve the quality of the water but will still allow the system to use a small amount of energy and function for a small scale design.

In the year 2017, we are faced with water shortage problems on a daily basis. The Western Cape region is suffering from severe droughts at the moment. Therefore it is important for us to start thinking smart about water usage and supply. Rainwater harvesting is a viable solution to water needs in rural areas. Using old techniques with modern-day technology the system design will make it an efficient and reliable source of potable water if the correct filtration is applied.

9 References

ABEL . (2017, May 2). Energy-efficient pumps. Retrieved from ABEL Pump Technology website:
http://www.abelpumps.com/en/3-Pump-Solutions/Energy-Efficient-Pumps.php

About, Inc. (2017, January 20). Can you Drink Rainwater? Retrieved from Thoughts.co web site:
https://www.thoughtco.com/can-you-drink-rain-water-609422

American Water Work Association. (1991). Manual design for a Slow Sand Filter. In J. M. Barret, J. Bryck, M. R. Collins, B. A. Janonis, & G. Logdon, Manual Design for a Slow Sand Filter (pp. 2-300). Denver: AWWA Research Foundation.

Aquarista. (2017, Febuary 6). Typical household water consumption. Retrieved from Aquaristaweb site:
http://www.capewatersolutions.co.za/2010/02/06/typical-household-water-consumption/

Bio Sand Filter Organization. (2004). The Biosand Filter. Retrieved from
http://www.biosandfilter.org/biosandfilter/index.php/item/229

Emerson Electric Co. (2017, February 13). DP Flow Engineering Guide. Retrieved from Chapter 3:
http://www2.emersonprocess.com/en-US/brands/rosemount/Rosemount-Site-Map/engineeringguides/Pages/chapter-03.aspx

Engineering Toolbox. (2017, March 17). Minor loss coefficients for commonly used components in pipe and tube system. Retrieved from Engineering Toolbox website: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/minor-losscoefficients-pipes-d_626.html

EPA. (2017, January 20). What is Acid Rain? Retrieved from EPA website: https://www.epa.gov/acidrain/what-acidrain

ETU. (2017, January 20). Infrastructure Development. Retrieved from ETU Local government toolkit:
http://www.etu.org.za/toolbox/docs/government/infrastructure.html

FLOWJET. (2017). Diaphragm Pumps. Retrieved from Diaphram Pumps Product list:
http://www.xylemflowcontrol.com/files/pt3_4Diaphragm_DrumPumps.pdf

GERM Africa. (2017, March 20). Glossary of Filtration terms. Retrieved from Germ Africa web site:
https://www.germafrica.com/filters/

Gordo, E., Khalaf, N., & Strangeowl, T. (2015). FACTORS AFFECTING SOLAR POWER PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY. New Mexico.

HarvestH2o. (2017, January 20). Potable Rainwater: Purification and Filtration. Retrieved from HarvestH20 website:
http://www.harvesth2o.com/filtration_purification.shtml

ITACANET. (2005). An Introduction to Slow Sand Filtration. Retrieved from WWW.ITACANET.ORG

MIT. (2016, December 12th). Water for All. Retrieved from Water Access in South Africa:
http://12.000.scripts.mit.edu/mission2017/case-studies/water-access-in-south-africa

SA Weather service. (2017, January 24). Durban Rain. Retrieved from Durban Rain Website:
http://www.dbnrain.co.za/showmodels.php

SHIMGE. (2017). QT Peripheral Pump. Retrieved from Shimge submersible pumps:
http://shimge-pump.com/5-6-peripheral-pump/245991

Solar Power World. (2017, January 15). How do solar inverters work. Retrieved from Solar power wolrd website:

Solar Scene. (2016, December 22). Solar geysers explained. Retrieved from Solar Scene website:
http://www.solarsense.co.za/solar-water-heating-explained.php

SSWM. (2017, January 24). Water Purification. Retrieved from SSWM info web site:
http://www.sswm.info/category/implementation-tools/water-purification/hardware/semi-centraliseddrinking-water-treatmen-2

Stats SA. (2016, June 31). Mid-year Population. Retrieved 2016, from Stats SA publications website:
http://beta2.statssa.gov.za/publications/PO302/PO3022014.pdf

StructX. (2017, April). Hydraulic Conductivity Ranges of Various Soil Types. Retrieved from StructX Website:
http://structx.com/Soil_Properties_007.html

Tech Brief. (2014). Slow Sand Filtration. In M. L. Phd.

Tizagenix. (2017, Jan 21). Rainwater Harvesting. Retrieved from Use-rainwater website:
http://userainwater.com/is-rainwater-safe-to-drink.html

White, F. M. (2011). Fluid Mechanics Seventh Edition in SI Units. In F. M. White, Fluid Meters (pp. 419-438). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Wind & Sun. (2017). Everything you Need to Know About the Basics of Solar Charge Controllers. Retrieved from Northern Arizona Wind & Sun web site:
https://www.solar-electric.com/solar-charge-controllerbasics.html/

About EPCM